Political fact or political fiction? The agenda-setting impact of the political fiction series Borgen on the public and news media

被引:3
|
作者
Boukes, Mark [1 ]
Aalbers, Lotte [2 ]
Andersen, Kim [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res, Dept Commun Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Grad Sch Commun, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Journalism, Odense, Denmark
关键词
agenda-setting; intermedia agenda-setting; political fiction; public agenda; media agenda; time-series analysis; politicotainment; democratainment; PRIME-TIME TELEVISION; ENTERTAINMENT-EDUCATION; MARKETPLACE; PRESIDENCY; CHARACTERS; NARRATIVES; SUPPORT; TRENDS; DRAMAS; WORLD;
D O I
10.1515/commun-2019-0161
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Politicotainment and democratainment are concepts used to identify the relevance of popular culture for citizenship. Among the most prominent examples of these concepts are political fiction series. Merging political facts with fictional narratives, such series provide a unique opportunity to engage the audience with political matters in an entertaining way. But can these series also affect the agenda of the public and the news media? Based on aggregate-level data of Google search queries and news-media content, the current study examines the agenda-setting effects of the political fiction series Borgen. Time-series analyses show that only a few Borgen episodes affected the public agenda and even fewer the news media agenda. Evidence is also found for negative patterns. Thus, we should be careful not to overestimate the impact of political fiction in terms of agenda-setting effects: It occasionally has agenda-setting effects but more often not.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 72
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条