Using weigh-in-motion data to determine bridge dynamic amplification factor

被引:6
|
作者
Kalin, Jan [1 ]
Znidaric, Ales [1 ]
Kreslin, Maja [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovenian Natl Bldg & Civil Engn Inst, Sect Bridges & Other Engn Struct, Dept Struct, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
D O I
10.1051/matecconf/20152402003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The dynamic component of bridge traffic loading is commonly taken into account with a Dynamic Amplification Factor (DAF) - the ratio between the maximum dynamic and static load effects on a bridge. In the design codes, this factor is generally higher than in reality. While this is fine for new bridges that must account for various risks during their life-time, it imposes unnecessary conservativism into assessment of the existing well defined bridges. Therefore, analysis of existing bridges should apply more realistic DAF values. One way of obtaining them experimentally is by bridge weigh-in-motion (B-WIM) measurements, which use an existing instrumented bridge or culvert to weigh all crossing vehicles at highway speeds. The B-WIM system had been equipped with two methods of obtaining an approximation to the static response of the. The first method uses the sum of influence lines. This method relies on accurate axle identification, the failure of which can have a large influence on the DAF value. The other method uses a pre-determined low-pass filter to remove the dynamic component of the measured signal; however an expert is needed to set the filter parameters. A new approach that tries to eliminate these two drawbacks has been developed. In this approach the parameters for the filter are determined automatically by fitting the filtered response to the sum of the influence lines. The measurement of DAF on a typical bridge site agrees with experiments performed in the ARCHES [1] project: dynamic amplification decreases as static loading increases.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurements of bridge dynamic amplification factor using bridge weigh-in-motion data
    Kalin, Jan
    Znidaric, Ales
    Anzlin, Andrej
    Kreslin, Maja
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (08) : 1164 - 1176
  • [2] Calculation of optimised bridge dynamic amplification factor using bridge weigh-in-motion data
    Kalin, J.
    Znidaric, A.
    Kreslin, M.
    [J]. MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, SAFETY, RISK AND RESILIENCE OF BRIDGES AND BRIDGE NETWORKS, 2016, : 172 - 172
  • [3] Using Weigh-in-Motion Data to Determine Aggressiveness of Traffic for Bridge Loading
    OBrien, Eugene J.
    Enright, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (03) : 232 - 239
  • [4] Model Updating Concept Using Bridge Weigh-in-Motion Data
    Hekic, Doron
    Anzlin, Andrej
    Kreslin, Maja
    Znidaric, Ales
    Cesarek, Peter
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (04)
  • [5] Data-Driven Bridge Weigh-in-Motion
    Kawakatsu, Takaya
    Aihara, Kenro
    Takasu, Atsuhiro
    Nagayama, Tomonori
    Adachi, Jun
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (15) : 17064 - 17077
  • [6] Collecting and using Weigh-in-Motion data in LRFD bridge design
    Sivakumar, Bala
    Ghosn, Michel
    [J]. BRIDGE STRUCTURES, 2009, 5 (04) : 151 - 158
  • [7] Enhancement of bridge live loads using weigh-in-motion data
    Sivakumar, Bala
    Ibrahim, Firas I. Sheikh
    [J]. BRIDGE STRUCTURES, 2007, 3 (3-4) : 193 - 204
  • [8] Contactless Bridge Weigh-in-Motion
    Ojio, T.
    Carey, C. H.
    OBrien, E. J.
    Doherty, C.
    Taylor, S. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (07)
  • [9] Probabilistic bridge weigh-in-motion
    OBrien, Eugene J.
    Zhang, Longwei
    Zhao, Hua
    Hajializadeh, Donya
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 45 (08) : 667 - 675
  • [10] Bridge Damage Detection Using Weigh-in-Motion Technology
    Cantero, Daniel
    Gonzalez, Arturo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (05)