In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:40
|
作者
Felker, Ely R. [1 ]
Lee-Felker, Stephanie A. [1 ]
Feller, John [2 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. [1 ]
Lu, David S. [1 ]
Princenthal, Robert [3 ]
May, Stuart [2 ]
Cohen, Martin [3 ]
Huang, Jiaoti [4 ]
Yoshida, Jeffrey [5 ]
Greenwood, Bernadette [2 ]
Kim, Hyun J. [1 ]
Raman, Steven S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ronald Reagan UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 757 Westwood Plaza Suite 1638, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Desert Med Imaging, 1133 N Palm Canyon Dr Suite B, Palm Springs, CA 92262 USA
[3] Rolling Oaks Radiol, 415 Rolling Oaks Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Pathol, 10833 Le Conte Ave,Suite 13-229 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Newport Urol Oncol, 1525 Super Ave 210, Newport Beach, CA 92663 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; MRI-Guided biopsy; Active surveillance; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ULTRASOUND FUSION; MRI; ANTIGEN; MEN; PERFORMANCE; TUMOR; STAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-016-0750-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy (MRGB) for detection of clinically significant disease (CSD) in untreated men with known or suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: 512 patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) followed by MRGB at one of three centers in this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, retrospective study. Exclusion criteria were prior prostate cancer therapy and incomplete Mp-MRI (n = 51). Patients (n = 461) were analyzed in two sub-cohorts: no prior PCa (NP) (n = 381) and active surveillance (AS) (n = 80). Detection rates of PCa and CSD (Gleason Score >= 3 + 4) were calculated and compared among subcohorts and by Mp-MRI assessment grade. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors for detection of PCa and CSD. Results: Mean patient age was 66 years, median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 7.5 ng/mL, and median prostate volume was 54 cc. A mean of 1.7 targets was sampled per gland. Significant adverse events (urosepsis and hematuria with obstruction) occurred in 1% (5/461). Overall PCa detection rates were 51% per patient (233/461) and 37% per lesion (282/757). 65% (151/233) of men with detected PCa had CSD. Per-patient PCa detection rates in the NP and AS subcohorts were 47% (178/381) and 69% (55/80), respectively, significantly higher in the AS group (p < 0.001). CSD was detected in 10% (47/451), 43% (96/225) and 84% (68/81) of lesions with Mp-MRI assessment grades of 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Older age, higher PSA, and lower prostate volume predicted MRGB detection of CSD (OR 1.07 and p = 0.003, OR 1.1 and p = 0.014, and OR 0.98 and p = 0.032, respectively). Conclusions: In-bore MRGB is safe and high yield for detection of CSD.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 962
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Ely R. Felker
    Stephanie A. Lee-Felker
    John Feller
    Daniel J. Margolis
    David S. Lu
    Robert Princenthal
    Stuart May
    Martin Cohen
    Jiaoti Huang
    Jeffrey Yoshida
    Bernadette Greenwood
    Hyun J. Kim
    Steven S. Raman
    Abdominal Radiology, 2016, 41 : 954 - 962
  • [3] The urologist’s learning curve of “in-bore” magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy
    Barak Rosenzweig
    Tomer Drori
    Orit Raz
    Gil Goldinger
    Gadi Shlomai
    Dorit E. Zilberman
    Moshe Shechtman
    Jacob Ramon
    Zohar A. Dotan
    Orith Portnoy
    BMC Urology, 21
  • [4] The urologist's learning curve of in-bore magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy
    Rosenzweig, B.
    Drori, T. R.
    Raz, O.
    Goldinger, G.
    Shlomai, G.
    Zilberman, D. E.
    Shechtman, M.
    Ramon, J.
    Portnoy, O.
    Dotan, Z. A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1417 - S1418
  • [5] The urologist's learning curve of "in-bore" magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy
    Rosenzweig, Barak
    Drori, Tomer
    Raz, Orit
    Goldinger, Gil
    Shlomai, Gadi
    Zilberman, Dorit E.
    Shechtman, Moshe
    Ramon, Jacob
    Dotan, Zohar A.
    Portnoy, Orith
    BMC UROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [6] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1749 - 1754
  • [7] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Lotan, Yair
    Xi, Yin
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Freifeld, Yuval
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Raj, Ganesh
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Hornberger, Brad
    Desai, Neil
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Francis, Franto
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (04): : 397 - 404
  • [8] PERFORMANCE OF IN-BORE MR-GUIDED TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTICENTER STUDY
    Felker, Ely
    Lee-Felker, Stephanie
    Feller, John
    May, Stuart
    Princenthal, Robert
    Cohen, Martin
    Lu, David
    Margolis, Daniel
    Kim, Grace
    Raman, Steven
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E827 - E827
  • [9] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy EDITORIAL COMMENTS
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06): : 1754 - 1754
  • [10] Re: Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Reply
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (06): : 1888 - 1889