The Economic Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Patients With Medically Managed Heart Failure

The objective of this study was to quantify the financial healthcare burden of mitral regurgitation (MR) on medically managed heart failure (HF) patients. Data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases were analyzed. Included patients had a minimum of 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims for HF with a 6-month preperiod (baseline). A 6-month postperiod (landmark) after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. Following the landmark period, patients had to have 12 months of continuous medical and prescription drug plan enrollment with at least 2 records of HF medication refills. A therapeutic intensity score was calculated based on HF medication usage. Medically managed HF patients were separated into 3 cohorts: without MR (no MR), insignificant MR (iMR), and significant MR (sMR). Healthcare utilization and all-cause expenditures were modeled to quantify the burden of MR. All models controlled for baseline demographics, co-morbid conditions, and HF therapeutic intensity. Medically managed incident HF patients with sMR had significantly more hospital days (1.91 vs 1.72 days; p = 0.0096) and annual expenditures ($23,988 vs $21,530; p < 0.0001) compared with no MR patients. No differences were identified when comparing iMR and no MR. When evaluating HF admissions, sMR patients had an estimated 50% greater HF admissions rate (0.036 vs 0.024; p < 0.0001) compared with no MR patients. Additionally, HF admits for iMR were 23% more than those with no MR (0.029 vs 0.024; p = 0.0064). In conclusion, evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the healthcare impact of medically managed HF patients. Both utilization and financial burden is more pronounced when MR is clinically significant. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.