Beyond money: Does REDD plus payment enhance household's participation in forest governance and management in Nepal's community forests?

被引:33
|
作者
Shrestha, Sujata [1 ]
Shrestha, Uttam Babu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Biol, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Inst Agr & Environm, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
INFLUENCING PEOPLES PARTICIPATION; COMMON PROPERTY INSTITUTIONS; COLLECTIVE ACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; GENDER; DECENTRALIZATION; DETERMINANTS; CONSERVATION; INEQUALITY; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Incentives can enhance community participation in conservation programs, but our understanding of how an economic incentive influences the participation of households in forest management is limited. REDD+ (Reducing Emission for Deforestation and forest Degradation) a climate change mitigation mechanism initiated by international communities provides payments to developing countries for better conservation of their forests. The REDD+ pilot project was implemented in community forests of Nepal through which REDD+ payment was distributed to the households involved in forest conservation. We examine whether REDD+ payments enhance participation of households in forest conservation, benefit provision, policy making, community services and capacity building programs in community forests of Nepal. Our results show that socio-economic factors such as education, family size, agricultural land holdings, and biophysical factors such as distance from respondent's household to the affiliated community forest are more likely to determine the participation in community forest management rather than economic incentive provided by the REDD+ pilot project. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Representation and participation in formulating Nepal's REDD plus approach
    Satyal, Poshendra
    Corbera, Esteve
    Dawson, Neil
    Dhungana, Hari
    Maskey, Gyanu
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2019, 19 : S8 - S22
  • [2] Forest Management Plans in Nepal’s Community Forests: Does One Size Fit All?
    Srijana Baral
    Christian Pilegaard Hansen
    Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri
    [J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2020, 19 : 483 - 504
  • [3] Forest Management Plans in Nepal's Community Forests: Does One Size Fit All?
    Baral, Srijana
    Hansen, Christian Pilegaard
    Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal
    [J]. SMALL-SCALE FORESTRY, 2020, 19 (04) : 483 - 504
  • [4] A Collaborative Forest Management user group's perceptions and expectations on REDD plus in Nepal
    Gilani, Hans R.
    Yoshida, Tomoko
    Innes, John L.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 80 : 27 - 33
  • [5] Does Adaptive Collaborative Forest Governance Affect Poverty? Participatory Action Research in Nepal's Community Forests
    McDougall, Cynthia
    Jiggins, Janice
    Pandit, Bishnu Hari
    Rana, Sushila K. Thapa Magar
    Leeuwis, Cees
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (11) : 1235 - 1251
  • [6] Rural household and forest: an evaluation of household's dependency on community forest in Nepal
    Adhikari, Mohan
    Nagata, Shin
    Adhikari, Murali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2004, 9 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [7] Exploring participation in ecological monitoring in Nepal's community forests
    Staddon, Sam C.
    Nightingale, Andrea
    Shrestha, Shyam K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 42 (03) : 268 - 277
  • [8] Incentives for community participation in the governance and management of common property resources: the case of community forest management in Nepal
    Adhikari, Sunit
    Kingi, Tanira
    Ganesh, Siva
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 44 : 1 - 9
  • [9] The contested role of management plans in improving forest conditions in Nepal's community forests
    Baral, S.
    Meilby, H.
    Chhetri, B. B. Khanal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2019, 21 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [10] Social inclusion and deliberation in response to REDD plus in Nepal's community forestry
    Devkota, Bishnu Prasad
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 111