Managing drug costs: The perception of managed care pharmacy directors

被引:0
|
作者
Litton, LM [1 ]
Sisk, FA [1 ]
Akins, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] Mercer Univ, Stetson Sch Business & Econ, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2000年 / 6卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine the perceptions of health plan pharmacy directors about drug costs and uti- lization drivers, interventions the plans use to control drug expenditures, and strategies considered necessary to permit continued provision of a comprehensive drug benefit. Study Design/Methods: A multipart survey developed and mailed to 500 pharmacy directors of managed care organizations across the country. Results: The survey respondents (response rate = 18%) represented managed cave health plans in the following percentages: 49% of respondents were from network/independent practice associations; mixed-model health maintenance organizations (HMOs), 20%; group HMOs, 15%; and staff-model HMOs and network/preferred provider organizations, 8% each. Drug mix and utilization were reported to be the primary drivers of drug expenditures. Half the respondents rated inflation as a somewhat strong cost driver. Interventions the health plans use to control drug expenditures include formularies, generic substitution, preauthorization, manufacturers' rebates, drug benefit design, physician profiling, target drug programs, academic detailing, and tiered copays. With the exception of formulary use, generic substitution, and manufacturers' rebates, which all the plans have instituted, the types of interventions used by the different model types vary widely. More than half the pharmacy directors reported generic substitution, drug benefit design, and differential copays as very effective interventions used to control drug costs. Conclusions: The majority of pharmacy directors predict continued double-digit increases in drug expenditures over both the short term and the long term. Of the respondents, 91% reported that additional limits and/or exclusions to the benefit design would be necessary to control these increases. To continue providing a comprehensive drug benefit, 54% indicated they would have to achieve sufficient cost savings in other areas to offset increases in drug costs.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 814
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing the Rising Costs and High Drug Expenditures in Critical Care Pharmacy Practice
    Flannery, Alexander H.
    Pandya, Komal
    Laine, Melanie E.
    Almeter, Philip J.
    Flynn, Jeremy D.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 37 (01): : 54 - 64
  • [2] Specific clinical competencies for managing care - Views of residency directors and managed care medical directors
    Yedidia, MJ
    Gillespie, CC
    Moore, GT
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (09): : 1093 - 1098
  • [3] Successful practice in a managed care environment: Managing costs while managing care
    Freston, JW
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 111 (02) : 516 - 518
  • [4] Managed care pharmacy, socioeconomic assessments and drug adoption decisions
    Lyles, A
    Luce, BR
    Rentz, AM
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (04) : 511 - 521
  • [5] The Effect of Managed Care on Prescription Drug Costs and Benefits
    Alan Lyles
    Francis B. Palumbo
    PharmacoEconomics, 1999, 15 : 129 - 140
  • [6] The effect of managed care on prescription drug costs and benefits
    Lyles, A
    Palumbo, FB
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 15 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [7] Pharmacotherapy: Strategies to control drug costs in managed care
    Monane, M
    Nagle, B
    Kelly, MA
    GERIATRICS, 1998, 53 (09) : 51 - +
  • [8] Managed care or managed costs?
    Dyer, AR
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 30 (03): : 317 - 318
  • [9] Anticipated efficiencies, real costs: Medicaid managed care organizations and the pharmacy benefit
    Bendicksen, Liam
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2022, 28 (03): : 354 - 361
  • [10] Managing pharmacy care
    Perri, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 1996, 60 (02) : 208 - 212