Facultative nest patch shifts in response to nest predation risk in the Brewer's sparrow: a "win-stay, lose-switch" strategy?

被引:75
|
作者
Chalfoun, Anna D. [1 ]
Martin, Thomas E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, USGS Montana Cooperat Wildlife Res Unit, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Behavioral plasticity; Brewer's sparrow; Habitat selection; Prior information; Re-nesting; BREEDING DISPERSAL; HABITAT SELECTION; SITE SELECTION; TENGMALMS OWL; CLUTCH SIZE; SUCCESS; FIDELITY; FITNESS; BIRDS; WARBLERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00442-010-1679-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Facultative shifts in nesting habitat selection in response to perceived predation risk may allow animals to increase the survival probability of sessile offspring. Previous studies on this behavioral strategy have primarily focused on single attributes, such as the distance moved or changes in nesting substrate. However, nest site choice often encompasses multiple habitat elements at both the nest site and nest patch scales. We studied the within-season re-nesting strategy of a multi-brooded songbird, the Brewer's sparrow (Spizella breweri), to determine whether pairs utilized a "win-stay, lose-switch" decision rule with respect to inter-nest distance, nest substrate and/or nest patch characteristics in response to previous nest fate. Pairs moved sequential nest sites slightly farther following nest predation versus success. When inter-nest distance was controlled, however, pairs changed nest patch attributes (shrub height, potential nest shrub density) associated with probability of nest predation to a greater extent following nest predation than success. The strategy appeared to be adaptive; daily nest survival probability for previously depredated pairs increased with greater Euclidian habitat distances between attempts, whereas previously successful pairs were more likely to fledge second attempts when nest sites were similar to those of previous attempts. Our results suggest that nesting birds can use prior information and within-season plasticity in response to nest predation to increase re-nesting success, which may be a critical behavioral strategy within complex nest predator environments. Re-nesting site selection strategies also appeared to integrate multiple habitat components and inter-nest distances. The consideration of such proximate, facultative responses to predation risk may clarify often unexplained variation in habitat preferences and requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 892
页数:8
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Facultative nest patch shifts in response to nest predation risk in the Brewer’s sparrow: a “win-stay, lose-switch” strategy?
    Anna D. Chalfoun
    Thomas E. Martin
    [J]. Oecologia, 2010, 163 : 885 - 892
  • [2] Win-stay, lose-switch and public information strategies for patch fidelity of songbirds with rare extra-pair paternity
    Campomizzi, Andrew J.
    Morrison, Michael L.
    DeWoody, J. Andrew
    Farrell, Shannon L.
    Wilkins, R. Neal
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2012, 2
  • [3] Win-stay, lose-switch and public information strategies for patch fidelity of songbirds with rare extra-pair paternity
    Andrew J. Campomizzi
    Michael L. Morrison
    J. Andrew DeWoody
    Shannon L. Farrell
    R. Neal Wilkins
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 2
  • [4] Win-stay/lose-switch, prospecting-based settlement strategy may not be adaptive under rapid environmental change
    Kloskowski, Janusz
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] Win-stay/lose-switch, prospecting-based settlement strategy may not be adaptive under rapid environmental change
    Janusz Kloskowski
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [6] Lifetime breeding-site and nest-site fidelity in a declining terrestrial toadlet: evidence for a win-stay/lose-shift strategy
    Byrne, Phillip G. G.
    Silla, Aimee J. J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2023, 4
  • [7] Nest predation risk influences the Varied Tit's life history strategy in response to temperature and precipitation
    Jiang, Yiting
    Shang, Fanmei
    Ma, Xiaocui
    Wan, Dongmei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY, 2022, 93 (04)