Methodological and Statistical Advances in the Consideration of Cultural Diversity in Assessment: A Critical Review of Group Classification and Measurement Invariance Testing

被引:72
|
作者
Han, Kyunghee [1 ]
Colarelli, Stephen M. [1 ]
Weed, Nathan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Psychol, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
test bias and fairness; categorizations of race/ethnicity and sex/gender; measurement invariance; multigroup CFA; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; OF-FIT INDEXES; FACTORIAL INVARIANCE; MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE; PREDICTIVE INVARIANCE; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; KOREAN MMPI-2; TEST FAIRNESS; TEST BIAS;
D O I
10.1037/pas0000731
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
One of the most important considerations in psychological and educational assessment is the extent to which a test is free of bias and fair for groups with diverse backgrounds. Establishing measurement invariance (MI) of a test or items is a prerequisite for meaningful comparisons across groups as it ensures that test items do not function differently across groups. Demonstration of MI is particularly important in assessment settings where test scores are used in decision making. In this review, we begin with an overview of test bias and fairness, followed by a discussion of issues involving group classification. focusing on categorizations of race/ethnicity and sex/gender. We then describe procedures used to establish MI, detailing steps in the implementation of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, and discussing recent developments in alternative procedures for establishing MI. such as the alignment method and moderated nonlinear factor analysis, which accommodate reconceptualization of group categorizations. Lastly, we discuss a variety of important statistical and conceptual issues to be considered in conducting multigroup confirmatory factor analysis and related methods and conclude with some recommendations for applications of these procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1496
页数:16
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Addressing diversity and inclusion through group comparisons: a primer on measurement invariance testing
    Rocabado, Guizella A.
    Komperda, Regis
    Lewis, Jennifer E.
    Barbera, Jack
    [J]. CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (03) : 969 - 988
  • [2] A Cross-Cultural Assessment of School Connectedness: Testing Measurement Invariance With United States and Chilean Adolescents
    Sass, Daniel A.
    Castro-Villarreal, Felicia
    McWhirter, Benedict T.
    McWhirter, Ellen Hawley
    Karcher, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 29 (05) : 428 - 442
  • [3] On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests
    Boer, Diana
    Hanke, Katja
    He, Jia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 49 (05) : 713 - 734
  • [4] Assessing Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire 2.0: A Methodological Systematic Review Regard to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments Guideline
    Qiao, Liang
    Chen, Dingbang
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhang, Luosheng
    Gao, Xin
    Chen, Jiajia
    Yu, Wenlong
    Xu, Jingren
    Chu, Peilin
    Huang, Quan
    Yin, Mengchen
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (04) : 1347 - 1355