Tobacco regulatory compliance with STAKE Act age of sale signage among licensed tobacco retailers across diverse neighborhoods in Southern California

被引:3
|
作者
Sussman, Steve [1 ]
Cruz, Tess Boley [1 ]
Smiley, Sabrina L. [1 ]
Chou, Chih-Ping [1 ]
Unger, Jennifer B. [1 ]
Kintz, Natalie [1 ]
Rodriguez, Yaneth L. [1 ]
Barahona, Rosa [1 ]
Lienemann, Brianna A. [1 ]
Pentz, Mary Ann [1 ]
Samet, Jonathan [2 ]
Baezconde-Garbanati, Lourdes [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Tobacco Ctr Regulatory Sci Vulnerable Populat, 2001 N Soto St,3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Aurora, CO USA
来源
TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES | 2018年 / 16卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
tobacco; age-of-sale signs; compliance; licensed tobacco retailers; race/ethnicity; YOUTH ACCESS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.18332/tid/91846
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION The California Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act requires licensed tobacco retailers to post minimum age-of-sale signage at the point of sale. This study investigated STAKE Act compliance in licensed tobacco retailers across four racial/ethnic communities in Southern California. METHODS The sample consisted of 675 licensed tobacco retailers (excluding chain store supermarkets and pharmacies) randomly selected based on zip codes from predominantly non-Hispanic White (n=196), African American (n=193), Hispanic/Latino (n=186), and Korean American (n=100) communities. A protocol for assessing signage was completed at each store by community health workers (promotoras de salud). The law changed from a minimum age of 18 to 21 years (Tobacco 21) during data collection, as of 9 June 2016. Differences in signage compliance were evaluated before and after changes in the State law. RESULTS Overall, 45% of the stores were compliant with posting the required age-of-sale signage (which varied in minimum age by date of collection); 14% of stores did not have any store interior age-of-sale signs, and 41% of stores had some type of age-of-sale sign but were not compliant with the STAKE Act (e.g. 29.5% of the stores had non-compliant tobacco industry We Card signs but not STAKE Act signs). Stores observed after the 2016 implementation of Tobacco 21 had significantly lower STAKE Act signage compliance rates (38.6%) compared to stores observed before the change in the State law (70.9%) (z=6.8623, p<0.001). The difference in STAKE Act sign compliance between stores located in AA communities (16.9%) and stores located in NHW communities (41.5%) observed within the first three months after the change in law was statistically significant (chi(2)(1)=20.098, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest the need for prompt, educational outreach to licensed tobacco retailers on age-of-sale signage changes, multiple compliance checks, and enforcement.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Retailer opinions about and compliance with family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point of sale provisions: a survey of tobacco retailers
    Shyanika W. Rose
    Sherry L. Emery
    Susan Ennett
    Heathe Luz McNaughton Reyes
    John C. Scott
    Kurt M. Ribisl
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 15
  • [2] Retailer opinions about and compliance with family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point of sale provisions: a survey of tobacco retailers
    Rose, Shyanika W.
    Emery, Sherry L.
    Ennett, Susan
    Reyes, Heathe Luz McNaughton
    Scott, John C.
    Ribisl, Kurt M.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [3] Factors affecting compliance intention on Tobacco Product Control Act among tobacco retailers around school of the 5th regional health in Thailand
    Thiamkhli, Nara
    Benjakul, Sarunya
    Kengganpanich, Tharadol
    [J]. TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2021, 19 : 64 - 64
  • [4] Non-compliance to the Tobacco Control and Regulatory Act among Vendors in the Vicinities of Schools of a Metropolitan City: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
    Gupta, Ankush Kumar
    Thakur, Dip Narayan
    Sah, Mukesh Kumar
    Yadav, Rakesh
    Basel, Prem Lal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 60 (254) : 865 - 869