Simulation of the new product development process for performance improvement

被引:74
|
作者
Bhuiyan, N
Gerwin, D
Thomson, V
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Eric Sprott Sch Business, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Engn Mech, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
new product development; concurrent engineering; sequential engineering; stochastic simulation; overlapping; cross-functional teams;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1040.0309
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the linkages between key features of the new product development (NPD) process and NPD performance and suggests ways of designing the process to improve performance. Using a stochastic computer model, we examine, under varying uncertainty conditions, how the key features of overlapping and functional interaction affect the performance measures of development time and effort (total person-days for a project). Findings indicate that, first and foremost, whether or not overlapping occurs, increasing functional interaction eventually leads to a trade-off between development time and effort. Second, an "early-start-in-the-dark" approach of increasing overlapping with no functional interaction is inferior even to an "over-the-wall" approach. Third, increasing overlapping when some functional interaction exists is beneficial in low uncertainty and harmful in high uncertainty Fourth, concurrent engineering (CE) is appropriate under low uncertainty, while a type of sequential engineering (SE), different than the "over-the-wall" approach, should be used under high uncertainty, and last, dedicated teams are suitable under high, and not low, uncertainty. We developed the model with the aid of a company and validated it against a published account of five case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1703
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New product development process: A simulation approach
    Bazilevich, L
    Udomratchatavanich, V
    [J]. TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT: KEY TO ENTERPRISE SUCCESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, : 53 - 59
  • [2] Extending continuous improvement to the new product development process
    Caffyn, S
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 1997, 27 (03) : 253 - 267
  • [3] Modeling and analyzing product development process for lifecycle performance improvement
    Yang, QZ
    Sun, JP
    Ming, XG
    Lu, WF
    Ganesh, N
    Brombacher, AC
    [J]. CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: THE WORLDWIDE ENGINEERING GRID, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 199 - 205
  • [4] Process and strategy influences on product development performance in New Zealand
    de Waal, Gerrit
    Knott, Paul
    [J]. SMALL ENTERPRISE RESEARCH, 2010, 17 (02): : 193 - 206
  • [5] THE NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS .2. IMPROVING THE PROCESS OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
    BARCLAY, I
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 1992, 22 (04) : 307 - 317
  • [6] Using Process Simulation to Manage New Product Development Pipeline Throughput
    Smith, Meg
    Farr, John V.
    Sauser, Brian
    [J]. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 24 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [7] New Product Development Simulation
    Schumacher, Terry
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF PICMET 09 - TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE AGE OF FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 1994 - 1999
  • [8] Assessing the relationship between practice changes and process: improvement in new product development
    Maylor, H
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 29 (01): : 85 - 96
  • [9] Improvement reviews in new product development
    Lilly, B
    Porter, T
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2003, 33 (03) : 285 - 296
  • [10] The impact of product-process complexity and new product development order winners on new product development performance: The mediating role of collaborative competence
    Chaudhuri, Atanu
    Boer, Harry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2016, 42 : 65 - 80