Cognitive load theory in simulations to facilitate critical thinking in radiography students

被引:0
|
作者
Louw, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Johannesburg, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med Imaging & Radiat Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
关键词
EDUCATION; HISTORY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.7196/AJHPE.2021.v13i1.1313
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Problem solving and critical thinking are top future skills. High-fidelity simulations improve critical thinking, but also increase students' cognitive load, possibly limiting their learning. Educators should therefore consider learning outcomes, problems that require critical thinking, the relationship between working and long-term memory, and intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads when developing simulation scenarios. Objective. To report on the application of cognitive load theory (CLT) and students' responses in terms of problem solving and new insights during and after a simulation experience. Methods. A high-fidelity simulation, targeting multilevel communication, teamwork and prioritisation of learning outcomes, was designed according to CLT. Eighty students participated in presimulation knowledge, skills and attitudes acquisition and 10 participated in the simulation. A qualitative descriptive design was followed and data were collected through video/audio recordings of the simulation and reflection session, supported by educator and critical observer notes. Qualitative content analysis allowed comprehensive summarisation of students' problem-solving abilities and emerging new insights. Results. Eighty second-year radiography students formed the target population, with 10 simulation participants comprising the sample. Communication with health professionals was good, but lacking towards patients. Intraprofessional team collaboration was suboptimal, but interprofessional team collaboration was good. Students were mostly unfamiliar with the prioritisation responsibility. Upon reflection, students came to new insights regarding teamwork and prioritisation. Conclusion. After application of CLT, critical thinking to facilitate problem solving during simulation was suggested and post-simulation reflection facilitated new insights. The exposure of large groups to the benefits of simulation validates further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A model to facilitate critical thinking of radiography students
    Pieterse, Tracey
    Temane, Annie
    Downing, Charlene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2023, 70 (04) : 369 - 379
  • [3] Cognitive load of critical thinking strategies
    Shehab, Hanem M.
    Nussbaum, E. Michael
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2015, 35 : 51 - 61
  • [4] Using a distributed systems laboratory to facilitate students' cognitive, metacognitive and critical thinking strategy use
    Marques Puig, Joan Manuel
    Daradoumis, Thanasis
    Arguedas, Marta
    Linan, Laura Calvet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2022, 38 (01) : 209 - 222
  • [5] Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations
    Fraser, Kristin L.
    Ayres, Paul
    Sweller, John
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2015, 10 (05): : 295 - 307
  • [6] Critical thinking ability of 3rd year radiography students
    Pieterse, Tracey
    Lawrence, Heather
    Friedrich-Nel, Hesta
    [J]. HEALTH SA GESONDHEID, 2016, 21 : 381 - 390
  • [7] University students' cognitive flexibility and critical thinking dispositions
    Karakus, Ismail
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] The meaning of critical thinking in diagnostic radiography
    Ramlaul, A.
    Duncan, D.
    Alltree, J.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (04) : 1166 - 1171
  • [9] Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development
    Fraser K.L.
    Meguerdichian M.J.
    Haws J.T.
    Grant V.J.
    Bajaj K.
    Cheng A.
    [J]. Advances in Simulation, 3 (1)
  • [10] Using EASY framework to facilitate economics students’ critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions
    Soon Yen Foo
    [J]. Asia Pacific Education Review, 2021, 22 : 637 - 654