Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat?

被引:96
|
作者
Riek, Blake M. [1 ]
Mania, Eric W. [2 ]
Gaertner, Samuel L. [3 ]
McDonald, Stacy A.
Lamoreaux, Marika J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Calvin Coll, Grand Rapids, MI 49506 USA
[2] Quinsigamond Community Coll, Worcester, MA USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[4] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
common ingroup identity; intergroup; intergroup threat; prejudice reduction; RACIAL-ATTITUDES; INTEGRATIVE MODEL; OUT-GROUP; PREJUDICE; CONTACT; ANXIETY; BIAS; SUPERORDINATE; IMMIGRANTS; SUBGROUP;
D O I
10.1177/1368430209346701
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Intergroup threat is regarded as a cause of negative outgroup attitudes; however, little research has attempted to examine ways of reducing intergroup threat. Two studies examine the effectiveness of a superordinate identity for reducing intergroup threat. It was predicted that when two groups were aware of a shared identity, intergroup threat would be lowered and attitudes would become more positive. In Study 1, perceptions of common identities among Black and White students were related to decreases in intergroup threat and increases in positive outgroup attitudes. In Study 2, when their shared identity as Americans was made salient, Democrats and Republicans experienced less threat and more positive outgroup attitudes compared to when political party identities alone were salient. In both studies, intergroup threat acted as a mediator of the relationship between common identity and outgroup attitudes, suggesting that a common identity increases positive outgroup attitudes by first reducing intergroup threat.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 423
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imagined Intergroup Contact and Common Ingroup Identity An Integrative Approach
    Vezzali, Loris
    Stathi, Sofia
    Crisp, Richard J.
    Giovannini, Dino
    Capozza, Dora
    Gaertner, Samuel L.
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 46 (05) : 265 - 276
  • [2] Defensive Helping: Threat to Group Identity, Ingroup Identification, Status Stability, and Common Group Identity as Determinants of Intergroup Help-Giving
    Nadler, Arie
    Harpaz-Gorodeisky, Gal
    Ben-David, Yael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (05) : 823 - 834
  • [3] THE CONTACT HYPOTHESIS - THE ROLE OF A COMMON INGROUP IDENTITY ON REDUCING INTERGROUP BIAS
    GAERTNER, SL
    RUST, MC
    DOVIDIO, JF
    BACHMAN, BA
    ANASTASIO, PA
    [J]. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1994, 25 (02) : 224 - 249
  • [4] Intergroup Contact Alleviates Loneliness: The Extensive Effect of Common Ingroup Identity
    Yu, Dongfang
    Bai, Jinhua
    Zhao, Yufang
    Yin, Chenzu
    Liang, Fangmei
    Zhang, Jun
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 : 1257 - 1270
  • [5] Ingroup positivity, outgroup negativity, and intergroup threat
    Gonsalkorale, K
    von Hippel, W
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 57 : 86 - 86
  • [6] Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient
    Brochu, Paula M.
    Banfield, Jillian C.
    Dovidio, John F.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [7] Interdependence in Mediated Intergroup Contact Exploring the Common Ingroup Identity Model in a Fictional Narrative
    Dale, Katherine R.
    Moyer-Guse, Emily
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY-THEORIES METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 33 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [8] Intergroup Relations in Latin America: Intergroup Contact, Common Ingroup Identity, and Activism among Indigenous Groups in Mexico and Chile
    Cakal, Huseyin
    Eller, Anja
    Sirlopu, David
    Perez, Andres
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2016, 72 (02) : 355 - 375
  • [9] The effect of intergroup threat priming on ingroup cooperation in social dilemma
    Yokota, K
    Yuki, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 330 - 330
  • [10] Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction
    Hornsey, MJ
    Hogg, MA
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (02) : 242 - 256