Funding characteristics of randomised clinical trials supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation: a retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Alain, Amstutz [1 ,2 ]
Stefan, Schandelmaier [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Roy, Frei [1 ,2 ]
Jakub, Surina [1 ,2 ]
Arnav, Agarwal [3 ]
Reem, Alturki [1 ,2 ]
Belinda, von Niederhausern [2 ,4 ]
Erik, von Elm [5 ]
Matthias, Briel [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Res, Basel Inst Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Basel, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Basel, Dept Clin Res, Clin Trial Unit, Basel, Switzerland
[5] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Inst Social & Prevent Med IUMSP, Cochrane Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
randomised clinical trials; clinical trial costs; early termination of clinical trials; non-publication; Swiss National Science Foundation; RESEARCH PROTOCOLS; PUBLICATION BIAS; COSTS;
D O I
10.4414/smw.2018.14587
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AIMS OF THE STUDY:Failure to publish publicly funded research represents a waste of scarce research resources across medical disciplines and countries. In Switzerland, about 40% of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) were not published. We aimed to describe funding characteristics of published and unpublished RCTs supported by the SNSF, to quantify the amount of money spent for unpublished studies, and to compare our results to a similar study performed in the UK. METHODS:We established a retrospective cohort of RCTs funded by the SNSF up to 2015. For each RCT proposal, two investigators independently identified corresponding publications in electronic databases and trial registries. Teams of two investigators independently extracted details from the original SNSF proposal and, if available, from trial registries or publications. In addition, we surveyed principal investigators about trial costs and additional sources of funding. RESULTS:We included 101 RCTs supported by the SNSF between 1986 and 2015. Most were single-centre RCTs with a median of 138 participants (interquartile range [IQR] 76-400). Overall, 67 (67%) principal investigators responded to our main survey questions. Median total costs per RCT were CHF 428 000 (IQR 282 000-900 000) of which the SNSF provided a median CHF 222 000 (67% of total costs, IQR 40-80%). Most investigators (70%) mentioned additional funding, mainly from their own institution or private foundations. A total of CHF 6.7 million was granted to RCTs that remained unpublished. Funding characteristics were similar to publicly funded trials in the UK. CONCLUSIONS:A third of the total SNSF grant sum spent on healthcare RCTs between 1986 and 2015 did not result in peer-reviewed scientific publications. New SNSF grant schemes might improve publication outcomes but their effectiveness needs to be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discontinuation and non-publication of randomised clinical trials supported by the main public funding body in Switzerland: a retrospective cohort study
    Amstutz, Alain
    Schandelmaier, Stefan
    Frei, Roy
    Surina, Jakub
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Olu, Kelechi Kalu
    Alturki, Reem
    Von Niederhausern, Belinda
    Von Elm, Erik
    Briel, Matthias
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):
  • [2] Rethinking the Funding Line at the Swiss National Science Foundation: Bayesian Ranking and Lottery
    Heyard, Rachel
    Ott, Manuela
    Salanti, Georgia
    Egger, Matthias
    [J]. STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 9 (01): : 110 - 121
  • [4] The author was partially supported by grant PDAMP2_137151 of the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the SwissMAP NCCR, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The obstruction to the existence of a loopless star product
    Willwacher, Thomas
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS MATHEMATIQUE, 2014, 352 (11) : 881 - 883
  • [5] Analysis of funding and hot spots of lung transplantation project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
    Li, Yupei
    Qiao, Jianhong
    Xue, Xiujuan
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (06) : 2869 - 2870
  • [6] Managing learning and clustering effects at the design stage in randomised surgical trials: a retrospective cohort of trial funding applications
    Conroy, Elizabeth
    Rosala-Hallas, Anna
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Burnside, Girvan
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    Gamble, Carrol
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [7] Inconsistent reporting of surrogate outcomes in randomised clinical trials: cohort study
    la Cour, Jeppe Lerche
    Brok, Jesper
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 : 380
  • [8] Completion and publication of clinical trials in a cooperative group: a cohort study of trials of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
    Hayoz, Stefanie
    Kasenda, Benjamin
    Schenker, Annina Lea
    Kopp, Christoph
    Schar, Sami
    Thurlimann, Beat
    von Moos, Roger
    Pless, Miklos
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [9] CENTRE FOR CHILD INJURY PREVENTION STUDIES: CASE STUDY OF NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION COOPERATIVE RESEARCH FUNDING
    Winston, Flaura
    Arbogast, Kristy
    Weiss, Eve
    Bolte, John
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 : A367 - A367
  • [10] Uptake of clinical trials in a palliative care setting: A retrospective cohort study
    Eastman, Peter
    Le, Brian
    McCarthy, Gillian
    Watt, James
    Rosenthal, Mark
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 11 (01) : 62 - +