A combined analysis of two pivotal randomized trials of a single dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle and daily Filgrastim in patients with stage II-IV breast cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Siena, S
Piccart, MJ
Holmes, FA
Glaspy, J
Hackett, J
Renwick, JJ
机构
[1] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Dipartimento Oncol & Ematol, Div Oncol Med Falck, I-20162 Milan, Italy
[2] Inst Jules Bordet, Unite Chimiotherapie, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[3] US Oncol Res, Houston, TX 77024 USA
[4] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[5] Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, England
关键词
breast cancer; febrile neutropenia; pegfilgrastim;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This combined, retrospective analysis compared once-per-chemotherapy-cycle pegfilgrastim with daily Filgrastim in breast cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy enrolled in two similarly designed, randomized, double-blind, pivotal trials. On day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, a single subcutaneous (SC) injection of pegfilgrastim [either 6 mg (n=77) or 100 mug/kg (n=149)] was administered, or daily Filgrastim SC injections (5 mug/kg/day; n=222) were initiated and continued until either absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to10x10(9)/l after the expected nadir or for up to 14 days, whichever occurred first. Individually, each of these trials demonstrated that a single pegfilgrastim injection per cycle is as effective at reducing the duration of severe neutropenia as daily injections of Filgrastim. Clinical efficacy data from the two trials were combined for analysis (n=448). The risk of febrile neutropenia (FN; absolute neutrophil count <0.5x10(9)/l with fever >= 38.2 degrees C) was significantly lower [11% vs 19%, respectively; relative risk = 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.89)] in patients receiving pegfilgrastim than for those receiving Filgrastim. Trends towards lower risks of hospitalization and intravenous anti-infective use were also observed. These observations were consistent irrespective of risk factors, including age, disease stage, performance status and prior treatment. Pegfilgrastim may offer patients more effective protection against neutropenic complications of chemotherapy with fewer injections and less disruption to their lives.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 724
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer
    Holmes, FA
    O'Shaughnessy, JA
    Vukelja, S
    Jones, SE
    Shogan, J
    Savin, M
    Glaspy, J
    Moore, M
    Meza, L
    Wiznitzer, I
    Neumann, TA
    Hill, LR
    Liang, BC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) : 727 - 731
  • [2] Once per cycle pegfilgrastim compaired to daily filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy in paediatric cancer patients
    Cacchione, Antonella
    Ferrara, Eva
    Roberti, Micol
    D'Attilia, Francesca
    Schiavo, Elisa
    Cappelli, Carlo
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2007, 49 (04) : 512 - 512
  • [3] An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy
    Wei Zhang
    Zhiwei Jiang
    Ling Wang
    Chanjuan Li
    Jielai Xia
    Medical Oncology, 2015, 32
  • [4] Cost-Utility Analysis of Lipegfilgrastim Compared to Pegfilgrastim for the Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Patients with Stage II-IV Breast Cancer
    Akpo, Esse I. H.
    Jansen, Irshaad R.
    Maes, Edith
    Simoens, Steven
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [5] An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy
    Zhang, Wei
    Jiang, Zhiwei
    Wang, Ling
    Li, Chanjuan
    Xia, Jielai
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 32 (05) : 1 - 7
  • [6] Single administration of pegylated filgrastim once per cycle compared to daily filgrastim in patients with primary breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Wenzel, C
    Bartsch, R
    Hussian, D
    Pluschnig, U
    Locker, GJ
    Sevelda, U
    Zielinski, CC
    Steger, GG
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 780S - 780S
  • [7] Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer
    Holmes, FA
    Jones, SE
    O'Shaughnessy, J
    Vukelja, S
    George, T
    Savin, M
    Richards, D
    Glaspy, J
    Mesa, L
    Cohen, G
    Dhami, M
    Budman, DR
    Hackett, J
    Brassard, M
    Yang, BB
    Liang, BC
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (06) : 903 - 909
  • [8] A randomized, multicenter pragmatic trial comparing bone pain from a single dose of pegfilgrastim to 5 doses of daily filgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (REaCT-5G)
    Ng, Terry L.
    Taljaard, Monica
    Savard, Marie-France
    Stober, Carol
    Nicholls, Stuart
    Vandermeer, Lisa
    Thavorn, Kednapa
    Hampel, Claudia
    Shamess, Jennifer
    Mills, Natalie
    Hilton, John F.
    Clemons, Mark
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF DOSE INTENSITY FOR ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY TRIALS IN STAGE-II BREAST-CANCER
    HRYNIUK, W
    LEVINE, MN
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (08) : 1162 - 1170
  • [10] Efficacy and safety analysis of once per cycle pegfilgrastim and daily lenograstim in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy FEC 100: a pilot study
    Rossi, Luigi
    Tomao, Federica
    Lo Russo, Giuseppe
    Papa, Anselmo
    Zoratto, Federica
    Marzano, Raffaella
    Basso, Enrico
    Giordani, Erika
    Verrico, Monica
    Ricci, Fabio
    Pasciuti, Giulia
    Francini, Edoardo
    Tomao, Silverio
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 : 457 - 462