Microstructure of the small intestine in broiler chickens fed a diet with probiotic or synbiotic supplementation

被引:30
|
作者
Bogucka, Joanna [1 ]
Ribeiro, David Miguel [2 ,3 ]
Boguslawska-Tryk, Monika [1 ]
Dankowiakowska, Agata [1 ]
Roberto da Costa, Rosario Placido [2 ,4 ]
Bednarczyk, Marek [5 ]
机构
[1] UTP Univ Sci & Technol Bydgoszcz, Dept Anim Physiol Physiotherapy & Nutr, Bydgoszcz, Poland
[2] Polytech Inst Coimbra, Agr Coll Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Agron, LEAF Linking Landscape Environm Agr & Food, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] CERNAS Res Ctr Nat Resources Environm & Soc, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] UTP Univ Sci & Technol Bydgoszcz, Dept Anim Biotechnol & Genet, Bydgoszcz, Poland
关键词
broiler chicken; probiotics; small intestine morphology; synbiotics; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; MICROFLORA; MORPHOLOGY; MICROBIOTA; HISTOMORPHOLOGY; MODULATION; PREBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1111/jpn.13182
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of dietary supplementation of a probiotic and a synbiotic on the morphometric parameters of the small intestine of broiler chickens. The experiment was conducted on three hundred sixty, one-day-old female Ross 308 chicks, which were randomly selected from 20,000 birds and divided into three treatment groups (n = 120) with ten replicates per treatment. The control group (C) was fed a commercial diet, the probiotic group (PRO) was fed the same diet with an added 1% of the probiotic Lavipan (R) (Lactococcus lactis, Carnobacterium divergens, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and the synbiotic group (SYN) was fed the commercial diet with an added synbiotic: 0.8% of the prebiotic RFO (extracted from lupin seeds) and 1% Lavipan (R). According to the manufacturer's data, apart from the typical probiotic action,microorganisms contained in the preparation release anti-bacterial substances (hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins) and, therefore, are antagonistic towards pathogenic bacteria present in the gut of animals. Supplementation took place in the first seven days of rearing, and all birds had ad libitum access to water and feed during the 42 days of the experiment. On the last day, all birds were slaughtered and samples from three segments of the small intestine were taken. Villi area, height, width and crypt depth ratios were read using Multiscan software. Synbiotic supplementation increased the BWG of broilers from first to tenth day of rearing, compared to the control group. The PRO group had improved villi morphometric parameters of the duodenum. In the jejunum and ileum, both bioactive substances improved villus width and villus surface area. Crypts were deeper in the small intestine of birds supplemented with bioactive substances, which allows greater renewal of the villi. As expected, the intestinal morphometric parameters of broiler chickens benefited from bioactive substance supplementation.
引用
收藏
页码:1785 / 1791
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Probiotic and synbiotic in broiler diet: performance and Enterobacteriaceae
    Leite, P. R. S. C.
    Oliveira, H. B.
    Souza, V. B. L.
    Rocha, F. O.
    Oliveira, T. H.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2020, 72 (06) : 2365 - 2372
  • [2] Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens
    Sarangi, Nihar Ranjan
    Babu, L. K.
    Kumar, A.
    Pradhan, C. R.
    Pati, P. K.
    Mishra, J. P.
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2016, 9 (03) : 313 - 319
  • [3] Probiotic supplementation as an alternative to antibiotics in broiler chickens
    Tomczyk, Grzegorz
    Niczyporuk, Jowita Samanta
    Kozdrun, Wojciech
    Sawicka-Durkalec, Anna
    Bocian, Lukasz
    Barabasz, Marcin
    Michalski, Marcin
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (01) : 147 - 154
  • [4] Effects of synbiotic probiotic and prebiotic supplementation on haematology and serum total proteins of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria tenella
    Matthew O.
    Danladi J.I.
    Joseph N.A.
    Dahiru S.
    Danlami A.A.
    Stephen K.
    Isiaku A.
    Khadijat G.A.
    Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2022, 31 (1) : 53 - 66
  • [5] Morphological Responses of the Small Intestine of Broiler Chicks to Dietary Supplementation With a Probiotic, Acidifiers, and Their Combination
    Elhassan, M. M. O.
    Ali, A. M.
    Blanch, A.
    Kehlet, A. B.
    Madekurozwa, M. -C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (01): : 108 - 117
  • [6] Diet supplementation with phytase on performance of broiler chickens
    Lelis, Guilherme Rodrigues
    Teixeira Albino, Luiz Fernando
    Calderano, Arele Arlindo
    Tavernari, Fernando de Castro
    Rostagno, Horacio Santiago
    de Araujo Campos, Anastacia Maria
    Garcia de Araujo, Wagner Azis
    Ribeiro Junior, Valdir
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 41 (04): : 929 - 933
  • [7] Effects of dietary probiotic and synbiotic supplementation on broiler growth performance and intestinal histomorphology
    Calik, Ali
    Ekim, Burcu
    Bayraktaroglu, Alev Gurol
    Ergun, Ahmet
    Sacakli, Pinar
    ANKARA UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2017, 64 (03): : 183 - 189
  • [8] Evaluation of Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic on Performance, Immune Responses, and Gastrointestinal Health of Broiler Chickens
    Ghasemi, R.
    Sedghi, M.
    Mahdavi, A. H.
    POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2020, 8 (02) : 175 - 188
  • [9] Synbiotic supplementation to decrease Salmonella colonization in the intestine and carcass contamination in broiler birds
    Shanmugasundaram, R.
    Mortada, M.
    Cosby, D. E.
    Singh, M.
    Applegate, T. J.
    Syed, B.
    Pender, C. M.
    Curry, S.
    Murugesan, G. R.
    Selvaraj, R. K.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [10] Effects of starter diet supplementation with arginine on broiler production performance and on small intestine morphometry
    Murakami, Alice E.
    Fernandes, Jovanir I. M.
    Hernandes, Luzmarina
    Santos, Tatiana C.
    PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, 2012, 32 (03): : 259 - 266