Two-minute tidal breathing methacholine bronchial challenge: Comparison of two jet nebulisers

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Zheng [1 ]
Wang, Hongyu [2 ,3 ]
Xie, Yanqing [2 ]
An, Jiaying [2 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Zheng, Jinping [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Inst Resp Hlth, Dept Allergy & Clin Immunol, State Key Lab Resp Dis,Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Inst Resp Hlth, State Key Lab Resp Dis, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] McMaster Univ, Firestone Inst Resp Hlth, Dept Med, Res Inst St Joes Hamilton,St Josephs Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
CLINICAL RESPIRATORY JOURNAL | 2021年 / 15卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bronchial; challenge; concentration; methacholine; nebuliser;
D O I
10.1111/crj.13374
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The American Thoracic Society (ATS) guideline for methacholine challenge testing (MCT) recommended using the English Wright (EW) nebuliser. However, other brands of nebulisers are also indicated to be acceptable for this technique, but further validation of nebuliser performance is recommended. Objective To compare the methacholine provocation concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC20-FEV1) measured by using EW nebuliser and DV 646 nebuliser. Methods Subjects were randomly assigned to undergo 2-min tidal breathing methacholine challenge with either EW or DV 646 nebuliser on two separate days, which were at least 24 hours but not more than 7 days apart. The above procedure was repeated for each subject in 1 month, but the nebulisers were selected in a reverse order. Results The study includes 15 mild and stable asthmatic patients. The geometric means (SD) of methacholine PC20 measured with using EW and DV 646 nebulisers were 1.82 (6.38) mg/mL versus 0.83 (1.82) mg/mL, respectively in the initial two visits and 2.56 (6.29) mg/mL versus 0.78 (1.40) mg/mL in the following two visits (both P < 0.05). There are well correlations between PC20-EW1 and PC20-EW2 (r = 0.99, P < 0.01), PC20-DV1 and PC20-DV2 (r = 0.88, P < 0.01), and between PC20-EW1 and PC20-DV1 (r = 0.91, P < 0.01), PC20-EW2 and PC20-DV2 (r = 0.78, P < 0.01). Conclusions PC20-FEV1 measured by using the two conventional jet nebulisers was both repeatable and the results were highly correlated.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 869
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2-Minute Tidal Breathing Methacholine Challenge: Comparison Of Two Jet Nebulizers
    Zhu, Z.
    Wang, H.
    Xie, Y.
    An, J.
    O'Byrne, P.
    Zheng, J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [2] Challenging the Two-Minute Tidal Breathing Challenge Test
    Lexmond, Anne J.
    Hagedoorn, Paul
    Frijlink, Henderik W.
    de Boer, Anne H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 26 (06) : 380 - 386
  • [3] METHACHOLINE BRONCHIAL CHALLENGE USING A DOSIMETER WITH CONTROLLED TIDAL BREATHING
    NIEMINEN, MM
    LAHDENSUO, A
    KELLOMAEKI, L
    KARVONEN, J
    MUITTARI, A
    [J]. THORAX, 1988, 43 (11) : 896 - 900
  • [4] THE TWO-MINUTE
    McKernan, John
    [J]. DALHOUSIE REVIEW, 2013, 93 (02) : 271 - 271
  • [5] Two-minute offertories
    不详
    [J]. CLAVIER, 2006, 45 (02): : 35 - 35
  • [6] Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods
    Dean, James
    Connor, Lucy
    Jackson, Natalie
    Keidel-Morgan, Brett
    Hamer, Daniel
    Singh, Dave
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [7] Methacholine challenges: comparison of different tidal breathing challenge methods
    Dean, James
    Jackson, Natalie
    Keidel-Morgan, Brett
    Hamer, Daniel
    Singh, Dave
    [J]. ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [8] The Two-Minute Radiologist
    Chen, Linda E.
    Bhargava, Puneet
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (02) : 149 - 150
  • [9] The Two-Minute Teacher
    Gunderman, Richard B.
    Bedi, Harprit S.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 1610 - 1612
  • [10] TWO-MINUTE HAND SCRUBBING
    Petry, Lucile
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1935, 35 (03) : 271 - 271