Enhanced Balanced Scorecard: A Proposed Sustainability Planning Platform

被引:0
|
作者
Tamayao, Mili-Ann M. [1 ]
Soriano, Virginia J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Philippines, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
关键词
QFD; TRIZ; ALCA; sustainability planning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
This work developed and evaluated a sustainability planning platform composed of a methodology and a tool suite called Enhanced Balanced Scorecard (EBSC). The platform was built on the synergy of widely used production systems design and evaluation methodologies and tools namely Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), and Abridged Life Cycle Assessment (ALCA). EBSC was designed to (1) address the deficiencies of existing frameworks and (2) exhibit the desired characteristics of a sustainability planning framework, which are: (a) allows possibility of certification; (b) integrates the social; (c) environmental, and economic dimensions of the organization; (d) involves continual improvement; (e) exhibits structural clarity; (f) involves participative decision making among internal and external stakeholders; (g) allows ease of information handling; and (h) considers individual characteristics of companies.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Fifth Pillar of the Balanced Scorecard: Sustainability
    Kalender, Zeynep Tugce
    Vayvay, Ozalp
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ISMC 2016, 2016, 235 : 76 - 83
  • [2] The Reverse Side of the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard
    Hartebrodt, Christoph
    Valentin, Annika
    [J]. ALLGEMEINE FORST UND JAGDZEITUNG, 2015, 186 (11/12): : 216 - 226
  • [3] BALANCED SCORECARD INSTRUMENT OF STRATEGIC PLANNING
    Stefanescu, Daniela
    Silivestru, Maria
    [J]. ROMANIAN STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2012, (02) : 24 - 39
  • [4] The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures
    Erik G. Hansen
    Stefan Schaltegger
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 133 : 193 - 221
  • [5] The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures
    Hansen, Erik G.
    Schaltegger, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 133 (02) : 193 - 221
  • [6] Design and planning of the balanced scorecard: A case study
    Hwang, Ming-Hon
    Rau, Hsin
    [J]. HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2007, 26 (03) : 217 - 227
  • [7] Significance of the balanced scorecard for strategic planning at Lufthansa
    Klingenberg, C
    [J]. BETRIEBSWIRTSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2000, 52 (01): : 67 - 71
  • [8] Enhancing the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard with scenario planning
    Othman, Rozhan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 57 (03) : 259 - 266
  • [9] Future Prospects in Balanced Scorecard Research: Sustainability Perspective
    Eklund, Mehtap Aldogan
    [J]. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 4 (02) : 192 - 213
  • [10] Port Authority of Cartagena: Evidence of a Sustainability Balanced Scorecard
    Suarez-Gargallo, Carlos
    Zaragoza-Saez, Patrocinio
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (05) : 3761 - 3785