Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review

被引:6
|
作者
Dodd, Madeleine [1 ]
Ivers, Rebecca [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zwi, Anthony B. [4 ]
Rahman, Aminur [5 ]
Jagnoor, Jagnoor [1 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Injury Div, 1 King St, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
[2] UNSW, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] UNSW, George Inst Global Hlth Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sch Social Sci, Hlth Rights & Dev Heard UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Ctr Injury Prevent & Res CIPRB, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Policy analysis; health policy; evidence-based policy; policy process; POLITICAL PRIORITY; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS; EXPERIENCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1093/heapol/czz044
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Over the last four decades, Bangladesh has made considerable improvements in population health, this is in part due to the use of evidence to inform policymaking. This systematic review aims to better understand critical factors that have facilitated the diffusion of scientific evidence into multiple phases of health policymaking in Bangladesh. To do this an existing policy framework designed by Shiffman and Smith in 2007, was used to extract and synthesize data from selected policy analyses. This framework was used to ensure the content, context and actors involved with evidence-informed policymaking were considered in each case where research had helped shape a health policy. The 'PRISMA Checklist' was employed to design pre-specified eligibility criteria for the selection of information sources, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and process of data extraction and synthesis. Through our systematic search conducted from February to May 2017, we initially identified 1859 articles; after removal of duplicates, followed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full-texts, 24 articles were included in the analysis. Health policy issues included the following topics: maternal and child health, tobacco control, reproductive health, infectious disease control and the impact and sustainability of knowledge translation platforms. Findings suggested that research evidence that could be used to meet key targets associated with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were more likely to be considered as a political (and therefore policy) priority. Furthermore, avenues of engagement between research organizations and the government as well as collective action from civil-society organizations were important for the diffusion of evidence into policies. Through this article, it is apparent that the interface between evidence and policy formulation occurs when evidence is, disseminated by a cohesive policynet-work with strong leadership and framed to deliver solutions for problems on both the domestic and global development agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 478
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking?
    Andrew D Oxman
    John N Lavis
    Simon Lewin
    Atle Fretheim
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7
  • [2] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 1: What is evidence-informed policymaking?
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Lavis, John N.
    Lewin, Simon
    Fretheim, Atle
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 7
  • [3] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking
    Andrew D Oxman
    Simon Lewin
    John N Lavis
    Atle Fretheim
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7
  • [4] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Lewin, Simon
    Lavis, John N.
    Fretheim, Atle
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 7 : 520 - 526
  • [5] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking
    John N Lavis
    Andrew D Oxman
    Simon Lewin
    Atle Fretheim
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7
  • [6] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking
    Lavis, John N.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Lewin, Simon
    Fretheim, Atle
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 7 : 255 - 261
  • [7] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review
    John N Lavis
    Andrew D Oxman
    Nathan M Souza
    Simon Lewin
    Russell L Gruen
    Atle Fretheim
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7
  • [8] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review
    Lavis, John N.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Souza, Nathan M.
    Lewin, Simon
    Gruen, Russell L.
    Fretheim, Atle
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 7 : 398 - 404
  • [9] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP)
    John N Lavis
    Andrew D Oxman
    Simon Lewin
    Atle Fretheim
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 7 (Suppl 1)
  • [10] SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: Preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking
    Lavis, John N.
    Permanand, Govin
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Lewin, Simon
    Fretheim, Atle
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 7 : 507 - 513