Effect of Budesonide Added to Large-Volume, Low-pressure Saline Sinus Irrigation for Chronic Rhinosinusitis A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:57
|
作者
Tait, Sarah [1 ]
Kallogjeri, Dorina [1 ]
Suko, Jasmina [1 ]
Kukuljan, Sara [1 ]
Schneider, John [1 ]
Piccirillo, Jay F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Clin Outcomes Res Off, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
NASAL IRRIGATION; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; EFFICACY; ALLERGY; UPDATE; ASTHMA; CARE;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0667
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Recent studies suggest that budesonide added to saline nasal lavage can be an effective treatment for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incremental effect of adding budesonide to large-volume, low-pressure saline sinus irrigation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a quaternary care academic medical center between January 1, 2016, and February 16, 2017. A total of 80 adult patients with CRS were enrolled; 74 completed baseline assessments; and 61 remained in the trial to complete all analyses. Data analysis was conducted from March 2017 to August 2017. INTERVENTIONS All study participants were provided with a sinus rinse kit including saline and identical-appearing capsules that contained either budesonide (treatment group) or lactose (control group). Patients were instructed to dissolve the capsules in the saline and use the resulting solution to irrigate both nasal cavities, using half the solution for each cavity, once daily for 30 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the change in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, pretreatment to posttreatment, in the budesonide group compared with the control group. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported response to treatment, as measured with a modification of the Clinical Global Impressions scale, and endoscopic examination scored by the Lund-Kennedy grading system. RESULTS Of the 74 participants who completed baseline assessments (37 in each study arm), mean (SD) age, 51(14.7) years, 50 (68%) were women. Of the 61 who remained in the trial to complete all analyses, 29 were randomized to budesonide treatment, and 32 to saline alone. The average change in SNOT-22 scores was 20.7 points for those in the budesonide group and 13.6 points for those in the control group, for a mean difference of 7 points in favor of the budesonide group (95% CI, -2 to 16). A total of 23 participants (79%) in the budesonide group experienced a clinically meaningful reduction in their SNOT-22 scores compared with 19 (59%) in the control group, for a difference of 20% (95% CI, -2.5% to 42.5%). The average change in endoscopic scores was 3.4 points for the budesonide group and 2.7 points for the control group. There were no related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study shows that budesonide in saline nasal lavage results in clinically meaningful benefits beyond the benefits of saline alone for patients with CRS. Given the imprecision in the treatment effect, further research is warranted to define the true effect of budesonide in saline nasal lavage.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 612
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LARGE-VOLUME PLASMA SOURCE FOR LOW-PRESSURE SPUTTERING
    TOOMBS, PAB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 4 (05): : 338 - &
  • [2] A large-volume low-pressure nasal irrigation delivers drug into the nasal cavity? An in vivo study
    Cnockaert, Pierre
    Vecellio, Laurent
    Dubus, Jean-Christophe
    Jamar, Francois
    Reychler, Gregory
    [J]. DRUG DELIVERY AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (05) : 1232 - 1238
  • [3] A large-volume low-pressure nasal irrigation delivers drug into the nasal cavity? An in vivo study
    Pierre Cnockaert
    Laurent Vecellio
    Jean-Christophe Dubus
    François Jamar
    Gregory Reychler
    [J]. Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 2024, 14 : 1232 - 1238
  • [4] Manuka honey sinus irrigation for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled trial
    Lee, Victoria S.
    Humphreys, Ian M.
    Purcell, Patricia L.
    Davis, Greg E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2017, 7 (04) : 365 - 372
  • [5] Effects of large volume, isotonic nasal saline irrigation for acute rhinosinusitis: a randomized controlled study
    Chitsuthipakorn, Wirach
    Thanaphiphatsatja, Angsuthorn
    Doungbuppha, Peeravuit
    Lawpoolsri, Saranath
    Seresirikachorn, Kachorn
    Snidvongs, Kornkiat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2021, 11 (10) : 1424 - 1435
  • [6] PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LARGE-VOLUME LOW-PRESSURE CUFFED ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBES
    GHALY, RG
    MEHTA, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 6 (03) : 223 - 232
  • [7] Quantification of Budesonide Retained in the Sinonasal Cavity After High-Volume Saline Irrigation in Post-Operative Chronic Rhinosinusitis
    Shipman, Paige A.
    Yathavan, Bhuvanesh
    Gill, Amarbir S.
    Pollard, Chelsea E.
    Yelleppedi, Venkata
    Ghandehari, Hamidreza
    Alt, Jeremiah A.
    Pulsipher, Abigail
    Smith, Kristine A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2024, 38 (03) : 169 - 177
  • [8] A prospective randomized blinded clinical trial: large-volume nasal irrigation with fluticasone propionate in the early postoperative period following septoplasty
    Tugrul, Selahattin
    Dogan, Remzi
    Senturk, Erol
    Eren, Sabri Baki
    Meric, Aysenur
    Ozturan, Orhan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2015, 5 (07) : 610 - 615
  • [9] Generation of large-volume plasma by making use of multi-needle plasma at low-pressure
    Hong, YC
    Shin, DH
    Lee, SC
    Uhm, HS
    [J]. THIN SOLID FILMS, 2006, 506 : 474 - 478
  • [10] Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Budesonide and Saline Nasal Rinses in the Post-operative Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
    Shameer Ahamed
    Divyan Samson
    Rajan Sundaresan
    Bhavya Balasubramanya
    Regi Thomas
    [J]. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2024, 76 : 408 - 413