Understanding Building Infrastructure and Building Operation through DOE Asset Score Model: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Project

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Na [1 ]
Goel, Supriya [1 ]
Gorrissen, Willy [1 ]
Makhmalbaf, Atefe [1 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Elect Infrastruct & Bldg Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is developing a national voluntary energy Asset Score system to he building owners to evaluate the as-built physical characteristics (including the building envelope and mechanical and electrical systems) and overall building energy efficiency, independent of occupancy and operational choices. The energy Asset Score breaks down building energy use information by simulating building performance under typical operating and occupancy conditions for a given use type. A web-based modeling tool the energy asset scoring tool facilitates the implementation of the Asset Score system. The tool consists of a simplified user interface built on a centralized simulation engine (EnergyPlus). It is intended to reduce the implementation cost for the users and increase model standardization over that of typical building energy modeling approaches. A pilot project with forty-two buildings (consisting most# of offices and schools) was conducted in 2012. This paper reports the findings. Participants were asked to collect building data and enter them into the scoring tool If available, participants also provided their utility bilis, existing ENERGY STAR scores, and previous energy audit/modehng results. The results from the asset scoring tool were compared with the building energy use data provided by the pilot participants. Two comparisons were performed. First, ASHRAE 90.1 prototype buildings were used as an industry standard modeling approach to test the accuracy level of the scoring tool Second, the pi lot buildings were used for comparison of the actual building energy use, either from the utility bills or via ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager, against the modeled energy use. It was intended to examine how well the energy Asset Score represents a building's system efficiencies, and if it is correlated to a building's actual energy consumption. The analysis showed that the asset scoring tool, which uses simplified building energy model could provide results comparable to a more detailed energy model The buildings' as-built efficiency can be reflected in the energy Asset Score. An analysis between the modeled energy use through the scoring tool and the actual energy use from the utility bills can further inform building owners about the activeness of their building's operation and maintenance. The building infrastructure analysis prodded by the tool can help building owners evaluate the as-built efficiencies of the building systems, independent of operational decisions. The pilot program has belped define the path for further development of the tool as well as the evaluation methodology for the building systems and high-highted several aspects that need to be addressed to improve the applicability and reliability of the scoring tool.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lessons learned from infrastructure operation in the CUTE project
    Stolzenburg, K.
    Tsatsami, V.
    Grubel, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (16) : 7114 - 7124
  • [2] Building the information infrastructure for a European virtual university -: The lessons learned in the CUBER project
    Pöyry, P
    7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, : 158 - 163
  • [3] Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building
    Barab, SA
    Hay, KE
    Barnett, M
    Keating, T
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2000, 37 (07) : 719 - 756
  • [4] BUILDING ITSS TO BE USED - LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE APLUSIX PROJECT
    NICAUD, JF
    LESSONS FROM LEARNING, 1994, 46 : 181 - 198
  • [5] Object lessons learned from a distributed system for remote building monitoring and operation
    Olken, F
    Jacobsen, HA
    McParland, C
    Piette, MA
    Anderson, MF
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 1998, 33 (10) : 284 - 295
  • [6] Building capacity in digital trauma counselling: Lessons learned from the 'Samopomoch' Project
    Javakhishvili, Jana D.
    Makhashvili, Nino
    van Voren, Robert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Lessons learned from building model-driven development tools
    Richard F. Paige
    Dániel Varró
    Software & Systems Modeling, 2012, 11 : 527 - 539
  • [8] Participation and model-building: Lessons learned from the bukittinggi workshop
    Jerome K. Vanclay
    Mandy Haggith
    Carol J. Pierce Colfer
    Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2003, 2 (2) : 135 - 154
  • [9] Lessons learned from building model-driven development tools
    Paige, Richard F.
    Varro, Daniel
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2012, 11 (04): : 527 - 539
  • [10] Knowledge transfer of eLearning objects: Lessons learned from an intercontinental capacity building project
    Lim, Hooi Min
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    Wharrad, Heather
    Lee, Yew Kong
    Teo, Chin Hai
    Lee, Ping Yein
    Krishnan, Kuhan
    Abu Hassan, Zahiruddin Fitri
    Yong, Phelim Voon Chen
    Yap, Wei Hsum
    Sellappans, Renukha
    Ayub, Enna
    Hassan, Nurhanim
    Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff
    Kassim, Puteri Shanaz Jahn
    Nasharuddin, Nurul Amelina
    Idris, Faridah
    Taylor, Michael
    Poussa, Cherry
    Karlgren, Klas
    Stathakarou, Natalia
    Mordt, Petter
    Konstantinidis, Stathis
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):