Construct validity - Experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator

被引:0
|
作者
Schijven, M [1 ]
Jakimowicz, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp Eindhoven, Dept Surg, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
surgical skills; surgical simulation; virtual reality; laparoscopy; assessment; construct validity; validation study;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-002-9151-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study was undertaken to establish construct validity of the Xitact LS500, a virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy simulator. The primary research statement is: "The clip-and-cut task on the Xitact LS500 virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy simulator mimics the surgical procedure of the clipping and cutting of the cystic duct and artery during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy adequately." Methods: According to the level of experience of the surgeon, an "expert group opinion" was formed resulting from 37 surgeons having performed over 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, and a "novice group opinion" was formed resulting of 37 surgeons having no experience at all with performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Participants received an instructed hands-on "tour" on the Xitact simulator and performed three formal simulation runs. Results: The "novice group" is younger and more surgeons are female. Performance scores in the "expert" group are significantly higher on the second (p value 0.011) and third (p value 0.005) run, compared to the novices' scores. Experts are significantly faster on completion of all three runs. There is an increase in score over runs in both groups, which is statistically significant in the "expert group." Less than one-third of surgeons in either group are able to correctly predict their performance score as generated by Xitact. Both "experts" and "novices" feel it is useful to train with Xitact LS500 in the surgical curriculum. Conclusions: Three hypotheses, formulated to operationalize the primary research statement, could be answered affirmatively. Although further validation studies are needed, the Xitact LS500 simulator seems to be able to discriminate between expert and novice surgeons in this research setting, and thus the construct for this setting is considered to be valid.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 810
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 - Laparoscopy Simulator
    Schijven, M
    Jakimowicz, J
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (12): : 1764 - 1770
  • [2] Face-, expert, and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 Laparoscopy Simulator
    M. Schijven
    J. Jakimowicz
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, 16 : 1764 - 1770
  • [3] The Intercollegiate Basic Surgical Skills Course - Laparoscopic skill assessment using the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator
    Schijven, M
    Klaassen, R
    Jakimowicz, J
    Terpstra, OT
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (12): : 1978 - 1984
  • [4] The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance
    M. P. Schijven
    J. Jakimowicz
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2004, 18 : 121 - 127
  • [5] The learning curve on the Xitact LS 500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles of performance
    Schijven, MP
    Jakimowicz, J
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (01): : 121 - 127
  • [6] Construct validity of the LapSim: Can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?
    van Dongen, K. W.
    Tournoij, E.
    van der Zee, D. C.
    Schijven, M. P.
    Broeders, I. A. M. J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (08): : 1413 - 1417
  • [7] Construct validity of the LapSim: Can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?
    K. W. van Dongen
    E. Tournoij
    D. C. van der Zee
    M. P. Schijven
    I. A. M. J. Broeders
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 : 1413 - 1417
  • [8] Assessment of construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator
    Rosenthal, Rachel
    Gantert, Walter A.
    Hamel, Christian
    Hahnloser, Dieter
    Metzger, Juerg
    Kocher, Thomas
    Vogelbach, Peter
    Scheidegger, Daniel
    Oertli, Daniel
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (04): : 407 - 413
  • [9] How to select aspirant laparoscopic surgical trainees: Establishing concurrent validity comparing Xitact LS500 index performance scores with standardized psychomotor aptitude test battery scores
    Schijven, MP
    Jakimowicz, JJ
    Carter, FJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 121 (01) : 112 - 119
  • [10] EXAMINING THE VISUAL CONTROL STRATEGIES OF EXPERTS AND NOVICES TO ESTABLISH THE VALIDITY OF A NOVEL TURP SIMULATOR.
    Dutton, Thomas
    Vine, Samuel
    McGrath, John
    Bright, Elizabeth
    Wilson, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E614 - E614