Bee Communities across Gap, Edge, and Closed-Canopy Microsites in Forest Stands with Group Selection Openings

被引:7
|
作者
Mullally, Hannah L. [1 ]
Buckley, David S. [1 ]
Fordyce, James A. [2 ]
Collins, Beverly [3 ]
Kwit, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Forestry Wildlife & Fisheries, Knoxville, TN 37796 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] Western Carolina Univ, Dept Biol, Cullowhee, NC 28723 USA
关键词
canopy; edge; forestry; pollinators; silviculture; VISITING INSECTS; NATIVE BEES; POLLINATION; DIVERSITY; REGENERATION; PREFERENCES; DISTURBANCE; MANAGEMENT; DISTANCE; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1093/forsci/fxz035
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
As insect pollinator populations continue to decline, it is essential to understand the impacts of anthropogenic activities, including forest management, on pollinator communities. Although multiple studies have shown that clearcutting is beneficial for bees, other less intense, selective silvicultural methods that result in disproportionate increases in edge habitat within stands are less well understood. We investigated bee community characteristics across microsites (center of cut, edge of cut, and closed-canopy forest) in three mixed-mesophytic forest stands subjected to group selection cuttings. Results revealed bee communities in the center of cuts and their edges to differ from those in forest microsites, and their diversity measures were higher than in forest microsites. Within-stand edge microsites did not differ from their cut centers in terms of their communities or their diversity. Finally, center of cut and edge microsites combined, and forest microsites, were characterized by different indicator species, thereby exemplifying differences between these two microsite groupings. These results suggest that group selection harvests support differing communities of bees across microsites and sustain a wide range of bee species, and that edges within these forest stands behaved more like extensions of canopy gap openings despite differences in forest physiognomy.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 757
页数:7
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Tree height explains stand volume of closed-canopy stands: Evidence from forest inventory data of China
    Xu Yanli
    Li Chao
    Sun Zhichao
    Jiang Lichun
    Fang Jingyun
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 438 : 51 - 56
  • [2] Edge effects of linear canopy openings on understorey communities in a lowland Atlantic tropical forest
    Prieto, Pablo V.
    Sansevero, Jeronimo B. B.
    Garbin, Mario L.
    Braga, Joao M. A.
    Rodrigues, Pablo J. F. P.
    [J]. APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2014, 17 (01) : 121 - 128
  • [3] Interception of sulfate deposition from a closed canopy to a forest gap edge canopy in a subalpine dragon spruce plantation
    ZHANG Yu
    WU Fu-zhong
    TAN Bo
    XU Zhen-feng
    LI Han
    LIU Jun-cheng
    ZHAO Hai-rong
    TAN Si-yi
    YOU Cheng-ming
    YANG Wan-qin
    [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019, 16 (12) : 2856 - 2866
  • [4] Interception of sulfate deposition from a closed canopy to a forest gap edge canopy in a subalpine dragon spruce plantation
    Yu Zhang
    Fu-zhong Wu
    Bo Tan
    Zhen-feng Xu
    Han Li
    Jun-cheng Liu
    Hai-rong Zhao
    Si-yi Tan
    Cheng-ming You
    Wan-qin Yang
    [J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019, 16 : 2856 - 2866
  • [5] Interception of sulfate deposition from a closed canopy to a forest gap edge canopy in a subalpine dragon spruce plantation
    Zhang Yu
    Wu Fu-zhong
    Tan Bo
    Xu Zhen-feng
    Li Han
    Liu Jun-cheng
    Zhao Hai-rong
    Tan Si-yi
    You Cheng-ming
    Yang Wan-qin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (12) : 2856 - 2866
  • [6] Canopy vs. understory: Does tree diversity affect bee and wasp communities and their natural enemies across forest strata?
    Sobek, Stephanie
    Tscharntke, Teja
    Scherber, Christoph
    Schiele, Susanne
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 258 (05) : 609 - 615