Assessing the Consequences of External Reference Pricing for Global Access to Medicines and Innovation: Economic Analysis and Policy Implications

被引:7
|
作者
Incze, Andras [1 ,2 ]
Kalo, Zoltan [3 ,4 ]
Espin, Jaime [5 ]
Kiss, Eva [2 ]
Kessabi, Sophia [2 ]
Garrison, Louis P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Baden Wuerttemberg Cooperat State Univ, Dept Healthcare Management, Lorrach, Germany
[2] AkcesoAdvisors AG, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Semmelweis Univ, Syreon Res Inst, Ctr Hlth Technol Assessment, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Syreon Res Inst, Budapest, Hungary
[5] Andalusian Sch Publ Hlth, Granada, Spain
[6] Univ Washington, Comparat Hlth Outcomes Econ CHOICE Inst, Dept Pharm, Policy, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
External Reference Pricing; Patient Access; Pharmaceutical Innovation; Price Regulation; U; S; Worldwide; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; SACUBITRIL-VALSARTAN; MARKET-SIZE; PHARMACEUTICALS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HYPERTENSION; COMBINATION; EXPENDITURE;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2022.815029
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: External reference pricing (ERP) is used to set pharmaceutical prices to improve affordability, but its application may have negative consequences on patient access-thus, equity-across countries and on global innovation. With the United States contemplating ERP, negative effects could be magnified. Our aim: identify and quantify some major consequences of ERP. Research design, methods: Besides relying on databases and ERP modelling, we developed a heart failure case study. 4-step approach: 1) review ERP policies; 2) establish worldwide "price corridor"; 3) quantify patient access and health outcomes impact by ERP; 4) estimate ERP impact on innovation.Results: Our ERP referencing analysis highlights its perverse effects especially in lower-income countries. As counterstrategies to protect their revenues, manufacturers often implement tight list price corridors or launch avoidance/delays. Consequences include suboptimal patient access-hence, worse outcomes-illustrated by our case study: 500,000 + QALYs health loss. Additionally, the ensuing revenue reduction would likely cause innovation loss by one additional medicine that would have benefitted future patients.Conclusion: This research provides key insights on potential unintentional consequences of medicine price setting by ERP worldwide and under a new proposal for the United States. Our results can inform stakeholder discussions to improve patient access to innovative medicines globally.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条