Organ allocation for transplantation in the USA and Korea: The changing roles of equity and utility

被引:6
|
作者
Bollinger, RR
Cho, WH
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Immunol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Keimyung Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
transplantation; organ allocation; organ procurement; kidney transplantation; liver transplantation; organ donation;
D O I
10.3349/ymj.2004.45.6.1035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Realizing the promise and managing the success of organ transplantation requires the creation of unique institutions. An Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) must be capable of increasing the supply of cadaver donor organs, of allocating those organs properly to recipients with due consideration for equity and utility, and of using scientific data to improve the system for the good of society. The OPTN should answer to the public and should expect public support. Both in the United States and in Korea major changes in deceased donor organ procurement and allocation are in progress. In the United States change takes the form of a renewed emphasis on achieving equity in kidney allocation without significantly sacrificing transplant graft or patient survival and the first ever use of purely objective, statistically evaluated criteria for liver allocation. In Korea where the OPTN is only four years old, change takes the form of a new brain death law and the creation of that country's first organ procurement organizations. In both countries, success in meeting the transplant needs of their populations will ultimately depend on the support of society and the cooperation of the entire medical community.
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1042
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Age and Equity in Liver Transplantation: An Organ Allocation Model
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Ross, Lainie Friedman
    Thistlethwaite, J. Richard, Jr.
    Vitale, Alessandro
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Cescon, Matteo
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Burra, Patrizia
    Cillo, Umberto
    Pinna, Antonio Daniele
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (10) : 1241 - 1249
  • [2] Disparities in organ allocation and access to liver transplantation in the USA
    Burr, Andrew T.
    Shah, Shimul A.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2010, 4 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [3] Organ allocation in the age of the algorithm: avoiding futile transplantation - utility in allocation
    Faitot, Francois
    Michard, Baptiste
    Artzner, Thierry
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 25 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [4] Lung transplantation and organ allocation in Brazil: necessity or utility
    Rodrigues-Filho, Edison Moraes
    Franke, Cristiano Augusto
    Junges, Jose Roque
    [J]. REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2019, 53
  • [5] Changing organ allocation policy for kidney transplantation in the United States
    Bhavna Chopra
    Kalathil K Sureshkumar
    [J]. World Journal of Transplantation, 2015, (02) : 38 - 43
  • [6] Justice, utility, and organ allocation
    Veatch, RM
    [J]. ETHICAL, LEGAL, AND SOCIAL ISSUES IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, : 57 - 67
  • [7] Achieving Equity in Organ Transplantation
    Wright, Linda S.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY NURSING JOURNAL, 2023, 50 (05) : 445 - 447
  • [8] Organ allocation: Balancing utility and justice
    Persijn, GG
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (10) : 1536 - 1537
  • [9] Dynamics of the Romanian Waiting List for Liver Transplantation after Changing Organ Allocation Policy
    Gheorghe, Liana
    Iacob, Speranta
    Iacob, Razvan
    Smira, Gabriela
    Pietrareanu, Corina
    Hrehoret, Doina
    Brasoveanu, Vlad
    Gheorghe, Cristian
    Popescu, Irinel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2013, 22 (03) : 299 - 303
  • [10] The changing landscape of organ transplantation
    Barrios, Roberto
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2007, 131 (08) : 1167 - 1168