Intracorporeal pneumatic shock application for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double blind prospective clinical trial

被引:9
|
作者
Dogramaci, Yunus [1 ]
Kalaci, Aydiner [1 ]
Emir, Anil [1 ]
Yanat, Ahmet Nedim [1 ]
Gokce, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey
[2] Mustafa Kemal Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey
关键词
Chronic plantar faciitis; Intracorporeal pneumatic shock therapy; New method; WAVE THERAPY; SWISS LITHOCLAST; HEEL PAIN; DEVICE; LITHOTRIPSY; RUNNERS; BONE;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-009-0947-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common clinical condition that usually resolves with non-operative treatments. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been used in the treatment of chronic PF not responding to other conservative measures; however, ESWT devices are expensive and available for daily practice in only few centers (In developing countries). A pneumatic lithotripter is a cheap and readily available device which uses pneumatic shock application for the intracorporeal lithotripsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of intracorporeal pneumatic shock therapy (IPST) application for the treatment of chronic PF using a cheap and readily available pneumatic lithotripter. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. A total of 50 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed PF were randomly allocated to either an active- (treatment) (n = 25) or inactive (placebo) (n = 25) group. Under local anesthesia and posterior tibial nerve block, a rigid probe was directly introduced into the calcaneal spur under fluoroscopic control; a standard protocol of 1,000 shock was applied during a single session into the calcaneal spur. The main outcome measure was the patients' subjective assessment of pain by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Roles and Maudsley Score before the treatment and 6 months later. At the 6 months, the rate of successful outcomes (excellent + good results) in the treatment group (92%) were significantly higher comparing to the control group (24%) (P < 0.001). Heel pain measured 6 months after using the VAS were 2.04 +/- A 1.67 in treatment group and 7.16 +/- A 1.57 in control group as compared to 8.92 +/- A 1.22 and 9.12 +/- A 1.23 before the commencement of the treatment. No complications attributable to the procedure such as rupture of the planter fascia, hematoma, or infection were observed during the study. This pilot study showed that IPST is an effective and safe method of treatment of patients with chronic PF not responding to conservative measures. IPST application should be considered before surgical intervention when the extracorporeal shock devices are not available for daily practice. However, further evaluation of this novel treatment is necessary to understand the exact mechanism of action.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 546
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intracorporeal pneumatic shock application for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double blind prospective clinical trial
    Yunus Dogramaci
    Aydiner Kalaci
    Anıl Emir
    Ahmet Nedim Yanat
    Ahmet Gökçe
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2010, 130 : 541 - 546
  • [2] Shock wave application for chronic plantar fasciitis in running athletes - A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Rompe, JD
    Decking, J
    Schoellner, C
    Nafe, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (02): : 268 - 275
  • [3] Prolotherapy Versus Phonophoresis and Corticosteroid Injections for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Karakilic, Gulseren Demir
    Aras, Muyesser
    Buyuk, Ferda
    Bakirci, Esra Sahingoz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2023, 62 (06): : 922 - 927
  • [4] Influence of local anesthesia and energy level on the clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave-treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis -: A prospective randomized clinical trial
    Labek, G
    Auersperg, V
    Ziernhöld, M
    Poulios, N
    Böhler, N
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2005, 143 (02): : 240 - 246
  • [5] Comparing the Role of Different Treatment Modalities for Plantar Fasciitis: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ravi Gupta
    Anubhav Malhotra
    Gladson David Masih
    Tanu Khanna
    Harsimranjit Kaur
    Parmanand Gupta
    Shweta Kashyap
    [J]. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2020, 54 : 31 - 37
  • [6] Comparing the Role of Different Treatment Modalities for Plantar Fasciitis: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gupta, Ravi
    Malhotra, Anubhav
    Masih, Gladson David
    Khanna, Tanu
    Kaur, Harsimranjit
    Gupta, Parmanand
    Kashyap, Shweta
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 54 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [7] Plantar fasciitis: A prospective randomized clinical trial of the tension night splint
    Batt, ME
    Tanji, JL
    Skattum, N
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 1996, 6 (03): : 158 - 162
  • [8] Comparison of High-intensity Laser Therapy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bidoki, Marzieh Zare
    Nasab, Mohammad Reza Vafaeei
    Aghda, Amidodin Khatibi
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 49 (03) : 147 - 155
  • [9] Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution and Ultrasonographic and Clinical Features After Application of Different Energy Levels of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Gzel, Sukran
    Senlikci, Huma Boluk
    Bal, Hakan Suleyman
    Haberal, Bahtiyar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 114 (02)
  • [10] Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Dextrose Versus Corticosteroid in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis Management: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Raissi, Gholamreza
    Arbabi, Amin
    Rafiei, Maryam
    Forogh, Bijan
    Babaei-Ghazani, Arash
    Soltani, Shayesteh Khalifeh
    Ahadi, Tannaz
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2023, 16 (01) : 9 - 19