Collaborative arrangements for Australian nurse practitioners: A policy analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Cashin, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] So Cross Univ, Sch Hlth & Human Sci, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
关键词
Administration; collaboration; healthcare collaboration; health policy; PRIMARY-CARE;
D O I
10.1002/2327-6924.12164
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: In Australia in 2010, nurse practitioners (NPs) were granted legislated access to the Medical Benefits Scheme (MBS) and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) as providers. These schemes are the federal schemes for third-party reimbursement for health care and medications. As a condition of access to the schemes, it was determined that collaborative arrangements needed to be in place as part of eligibility criteria for NPs. This article is the first published policy analysis of this determination. Data sources: Published literature and available grey literature (including meeting minutes), and media content, was accessed and analyzed. Conclusions: The policy that was the National Health Collaborative arrangements for Nurse Practitioners Determination to amend the Australian National Health Act 1953 was a success. The policy led to NP access as providers to the MBS and PBS in Australia. Implications for practice: Understanding the policy process as it relates to the determination of the need for collaborative arrangements demystifies the process and origins of the policy for NPs in Australia. Understanding the determination means NPs in Australia will not artificially reduce scope of practice based on recommendations from the medical lobby. Clear research direction is provided that may inform the next policy cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 554
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collaborative arrangements and privately practising nurse practitioners in Australia: results from a national survey
    Currie, Jane
    Chiarella, Mary
    Buckley, Thomas
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2017, 41 (05) : 533 - 540
  • [2] Australian Nurse Practitioners at an Impasse
    Boase, Leanne
    [J]. JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2021, 17 (05): : 638 - 638
  • [3] Managed care organizations' arrangements with nurse practitioners
    Mason, DJ
    Cohen, SS
    ODonnell, JP
    Baxter, K
    Chase, AB
    [J]. NURSING ECONOMICS, 1997, 15 (06): : 306 - 314
  • [4] Clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners: Collaborative practice
    Prodan-Bhalla, Natasha
    MacKay, Martha
    Kaan, Annemarie
    Fofonoff, Doreen
    Galte, Carol
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 23 : 312C - 312C
  • [5] Nurse Practitioners, Policy and Politics
    Raftery, Chris
    [J]. JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2016, 12 (02): : 127 - 127
  • [6] INTEGRATED AND COLLABORATIVE TRAINING FOR PSYCHIATRISTS AND NURSE PRACTITIONERS
    Koh, Steve
    Marrone, Laura F.
    Malak, Lawrence
    Sietsma, Alexandra C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 23 (03): : S31 - S32
  • [7] Nephrology nurse practitioners in a collaborative care model
    Bolton, WK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 31 (05) : 786 - 793
  • [8] Public Policy Involvement by Nurse Practitioners
    Lorette S. Oden
    James H. Price
    Ruth Alteneder
    Debra Boardley
    Sunday E. Ubokudom
    [J]. Journal of Community Health, 2000, 25 : 139 - 155
  • [9] Public policy involvement by nurse practitioners
    Oden, LS
    Price, JH
    Alteneder, R
    Boardley, D
    Ubokudom, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 25 (02) : 139 - 155
  • [10] Liability and collaborative arrangements for nurse practitioner practice in Australia
    Chiarella, Mary
    Currie, Jane
    Wand, Tim
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2020, 44 (02) : 172 - 177