A comparison of T-wave alternans, signal averaged electrocardiography and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification

被引:199
|
作者
Gold, MR
Bloomfield, DM
Anderson, KP
El-Sherif, NE
Wilber, DJ
Groh, WJ
Estes, NAM
Kaufman, ES
Greenberg, ML
Rosenbaum, DS
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Med Syst, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Columbia Presbyterian Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY USA
[5] Univ Chicago Hosp, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[7] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[8] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01017-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to compare T-wave alternans (TWA), signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) and programmed ventricular stimulation (EPS) for arrhythmia risk stratification in patients undergoing electrophysiology study. BACKGROUND Accurate identification of patients at increased risk for sustained ventricular arrhythmias is critical to prevent sudden cardiac death. T-wave alternans is a heart rate dependent measure of repolarization that correlates with arrhythmia vulnerability in animal and human studies. Signal-averaged electrocardiography and EPS are more established tests used for risk stratification. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter trial of 313 patients in sinus rhythm who were undergoing electrophysiologic study. T-wave alternans, assessed with bicycle ergometry, and SAECG were measured before EPS. The primary end point was sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or appropriate implantable defibrillator (ICD) therapy, and the secondary end point was any of these arrhythmias or all-cause mortality. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the primary end point showed that TWA predicted events with a relative risk of 10.9, EPS had a relative risk of 7.1 and SAECG had a relative risk of 4.5. The relative risks for the secondary end point were 13.9, 4.7 and 3.3, respectively (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis of 11 clinical parameters identified only TWA and EPS as independent predictors of events. In the prespecified subgroup with known or suspected ventricular arrhythmias, TWA predicted primary end points with a relative risk of 6.1 and secondary end points with a relative risk of 8.0. CONCLUSIONS T-wave alternans is a strong independent predictor of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias or death. It performed as well as programmed stimulation and better than SAECG in risk stratifying patients for life-threatening arrhythmias. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:2247 / 2253
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of T-wave alternans and programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk stratification in athletes
    Inama, G.
    Nanetti, M.
    Pedrinazzi, C.
    Durin, O.
    Donato, G.
    Agricola, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 843 - 843
  • [2] T-wave alternans and arrhythmia risk stratification
    El-Sherif, N
    Turitto, G
    Pedalino, RP
    Robotis, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2001, 6 (04) : 323 - 332
  • [3] T-wave alternans for arrhythmia risk stratification
    Osman, AF
    Gold, MR
    [J]. HEART DISEASE: NEW TRENDS IN RESEARCH, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT, 2001, : 591 - 596
  • [4] Microvolt T-wave alternans for risk stratification in athletes with ventricular arrhythmias: Correlation with programmed ventricular stimulation
    Inama, Giuseppe
    Pedrinazzi, Claudio
    Durin, Ornella
    Nanetti, Massimiliano
    Donato, Giorgio
    Pizzi, Rita
    Assanelli, Deodato
    [J]. ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2008, 13 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [5] T wave alternans for ventricular arrhythmia risk stratification
    Osman, AF
    Gold, MR
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 17 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [6] T wave alternans for ventricular arrhythmia risk stratification
    Gold, MR
    Spencer, W
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 18 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [7] Role of electrophysiologic studies, signal-averaged electrocardiography, heart rate variability, T-wave alternans, and loop recorders for risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias
    Iravanian, S
    Arshad, A
    Steinberg, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 14 (01): : 16 - 19
  • [8] Is T-wave alternans as good or better than programmed ventricular stimulation?
    Narayan, Sanjiv M.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2007, 4 (07) : 913 - 915
  • [9] Microvolt T-Wave alternans for arrhythmia risk stratification in left ventricular dysfunction - Which patients benefit?
    Klingenheben, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (02) : 174 - 175
  • [10] T-wave alternans for arrhythmia risk stratification in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
    Verrier, RL
    Tolat, AV
    Josephson, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (12) : 2225 - 2227