Development and pilot testing of an online case-based approach to shared decision making skills training for clinicians

被引:21
|
作者
Volk, Robert J. [1 ]
Shokar, Navkiran K. [2 ]
Leal, Viola B. [1 ]
Bulik, Robert J. [3 ]
Linder, Suzanne K. [4 ]
Mullen, Patricia Dolan [5 ]
Wexler, Richard M. [6 ]
Shokar, Gurjeet S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Unit 1444, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr El Paso, Paul L Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX 79905 USA
[3] LPI Global Consultants Innovat Funding Partners, Prescott, AZ 86305 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Rehabil Sci, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[5] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Healthwise Informed Med Decis Fdn, Boston, MA 02108 USA
关键词
Decision making; Medical education; Primary health care; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; FAMILY MEDICINE CLERKSHIP; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; AIDS; CARE; PHYSICIANS; BARRIERS; RECOMMENDATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-14-95
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although research suggests that patients prefer a shared decision making (SDM) experience when making healthcare decisions, clinicians do not routinely implement SDM into their practice and training programs are needed. Using a novel case-based strategy, we developed and pilot tested an online educational program to promote shared decision making (SDM) by primary care clinicians. Methods: A three-phased approach was used: 1) development of a conceptual model of the SDM process; 2) development of an online teaching case utilizing the Design A Case (DAC) authoring template, a well-tested process used to create peer-reviewed web-based clinical cases across all levels of healthcare training; and 3) pilot testing of the case. Participants were clinician members affiliated with several primary care research networks across the United States who answered an invitation email. The case used prostate cancer screening as the clinical context and was delivered online. Post-intervention ratings of clinicians' general knowledge of SDM, knowledge of specific SDM steps, confidence in and intention to perform SDM steps were also collected online. Results: Seventy-nine clinicians initially volunteered to participate in the study, of which 49 completed the case and provided evaluations. Forty-three clinicians (87.8%) reported the case met all the learning objectives, and 47 (95.9%) indicated the case was relevant for other equipoise decisions. Thirty-one clinicians (63.3%) accessed supplementary information via links provided in the case. After viewing the case, knowledge of SDM was high (over 90% correctly identified the steps in a SDM process). Determining a patient's preferred role in making the decision (62.5% very confident) and exploring a patient's values (65.3% very confident) about the decisions were areas where clinician confidence was lowest. More than 70% of the clinicians intended to perform SDM in the future. Conclusions: A comprehensive model of the SDM process was used to design a case-based approach to teaching SDM skills to primary care clinicians. The case was favorably rated in this pilot study. Clinician skills training for helping patients clarify their values and for assessing patients' desire for involvement in decision making remain significant challenges and should be a focus of future comparative studies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and pilot testing of an online case-based approach to shared decision making skills training for clinicians
    Robert J Volk
    Navkiran K Shokar
    Viola B Leal
    Robert J Bulik
    Suzanne K Linder
    Patricia Dolan Mullen
    Richard M Wexler
    Gurjeet S Shokar
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14
  • [2] The Development and Evaluation of Personalized Training in Shared Decision-making Skills for Rheumatologists
    Mahmood, Sehrash
    Hazes, Johanna M. W.
    Veldt, Petra
    van Riel, Piet
    Landewe, Robert
    Moens, Hein Bernelot
    Pasma, Annelieke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 47 (02) : 290 - 297
  • [3] Case-based reasoning approach in bid decision making
    Chua, DKH
    Li, DZ
    Chan, WT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2001, 127 (01): : 35 - 45
  • [4] Case-based approach for supporting strategy decision making
    Surma, Jerzy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2015, 32 (04) : 546 - 554
  • [5] A SURVEY OF PRIMARY CARE CLINICIANS ON USE OF DECISION AIDS AND CONFIDENCE IN SHARED DECISION MAKING SKILLS
    Simmons, Leigh H.
    Leavitt, Lauren
    Greipp, Christine
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S104 - S105
  • [6] Virtual patient educational intervention for the development of shared decision-making skills: a pilot study
    Jacklin, Simon
    Chapman, Stephen
    Maskrey, Neal
    [J]. BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2019, 5 (04): : 215 - 217
  • [7] Teaching clinicians shared decision making and risk communication online: an evaluation study
    Hoffmann, Tammy C.
    Del Mar, Chris
    Santhirapala, Ramai
    Freeman, Alexandra
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2021, 26 (05) : 253
  • [8] An experiment on case-based decision making
    Grosskopf, Brit
    Sarin, Rajiv
    Watson, Elizabeth
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2015, 79 (04) : 639 - 666
  • [9] An experiment on case-based decision making
    Brit Grosskopf
    Rajiv Sarin
    Elizabeth Watson
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2015, 79 : 639 - 666
  • [10] The Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Online Sales: The Case-Based Decision Theory Approach
    Huang, M.
    Pape, A. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY, 2020, 43 (03) : 463 - 490