A Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for the Selection of Suitable Renewable Energy Sources

被引:26
|
作者
Wang, Chia-Nan [1 ]
Kao, Jui-Chung [2 ]
Wang, Yen-Hui [3 ]
Van Thanh Nguyen [4 ]
Viet Tinh Nguyen [4 ]
Husain, Syed Tam [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
[2] Natl Kaohsiung Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Marine Affairs & Business Management, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
[3] Chihlee Univ Technol, Dept Informat Management, New Taipei 220305, Taiwan
[4] Van Lang Univ, Fac Commerce, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam
关键词
renewable energy; wind energy; solid waste energy; solar energy; biomass energy; MCDM; G-AHP; WASPAS; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOCATION SELECTION; MCDM; AHP;
D O I
10.3390/math9121318
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
With the expansion of its industrial and manufacturing sectors, with the goal of positioning Vietnam as the world's new production hub, Vietnam is forecast to face a surge in energy demand. Today, the main source of energy of Vietnam is fossil fuels, which are not environmentally friendly and are rapidly depleting. The speed of extraction and consumption of fossil fuels is too fast, causing them to become increasingly scarce and gradually depleted. Renewable energy options, such as solar, wind, hydro electrical, and biomass, can be considered as sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels. However, to ensure the effectiveness of renewable energy development initiatives, technological, economic, and environmental must be taken in consideration when choosing a suitable renewable energy resource. In this research, the authors present a multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM) implementing the grey analytic hierarchy process (G-AHP) method and the weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) method for the selection of optimal renewable energy sources for the energy sector of Vietnam. The results of the proposed model have determined that solar energy is the optimal source of renewable energy with a performance score of 0.8822, followed by wind (0.8766), biomass (0.8488), and solid waste energy (0.8135) based on the calculations of the aforementioned methods.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条