Use of Distraction Osteogenesis to Change Endocranial Morphology in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis Patients

被引:49
|
作者
Choi, Jong Woo [1 ]
Ra, Young Shin
Hong, Seok Ho
Kim, Hoon
Shin, Hyun Woo
Chung, In Wook
Kim, Tae Gon
Park, Sang Hoon
Koh, Kyung S.
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
HELMET THERAPY; CRANIAL VAULT; SYNOSTOSIS; SKULL; ADVANCEMENT; ASYMMETRY; DIAGNOSIS; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e6c4b7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The endocranial morphology of the skull base is an important factor in determining craniofacial asymmetry. Moreover, although the patency of cranial suture would be the first determining factor, unicoronal, unilambdoid synostosis and deformational plagiocephaly can also be differentiated by means of axis angulation of anterior and posterior cranial fossa. These findings indicate the importance of endocranial morphology in craniofacial asymmetry. The authors hypothesized that distraction of the skull base might cause stress on the skull base that could modify skull base angulation deformities. Methods: This study compared the distraction technique with traditional bone repositioning techniques for remodeling skull base axis deformities in synostotic plagiocephaly patients. The study recruited 19 unicoronal craniosynostotic patients, of whom seven underwent distraction treatment and 12 underwent traditional bone graft treatment. Results: The authors found that both approaches resulted in successful outcomes in terms of exocranial morphology correction, but that the distraction technique may offer advantages over traditional methods. Moreover, the authors found that distraction did modify the skull base angulation. Distraction created more changes in the endocranial morphology. The average correction of skull base angulation with distraction was from 164.6 to 174.3 degrees, whereas the correction for the traditional technique was from 165.2 to 166.2 degrees. The amount of change in skull base axis was statistically significant according to the Mann-Whitney test (p < 0.001), but the change in cranial index of asymmetry was not (p = 0.363). Conclusion: The skull base axis in synostotic plagiocephaly, which is composed of the anterior and posterior cranial fossa, underwent greater correction using the distraction method. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126: 995, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1004
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hemi one-piece distraction osteogenesis for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis
    Kim, Tae Hyung
    Kim, Young Chul
    Rah, Young Shin
    Choi, Jong Woo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 52 (02) : 252 - 259
  • [2] Comparison of Distraction Osteogenesis and Single-Stage Remodeling for Correction of Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis
    Corkum, Joseph P.
    Burke, Emily
    Samargandi, Osama
    Retrouvey, Helene
    Bezuhly, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (02) : 370 - 376
  • [3] Hybrid of distraction osteogenesis unilateral frontal distraction and supraorbital reshaping in correction of unilateral coronal synostosis
    Satoh, K
    Mitsukawa, N
    Hayashi, R
    Hosaka, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 15 (06) : 953 - 959
  • [4] Coronal suture response to distraction osteogenesis in rabbits with delayed-onset craniosynostosis
    Losken, HW
    Mooney, MP
    Zoldos, J
    Tschakaloff, A
    Burrows, AM
    Smith, TD
    Cano, G
    Arnott, R
    Sherwood, C
    Dechant, J
    Cooper, GM
    Kapucu, MR
    Siegel, MI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 10 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [5] Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis
    Dundulis, JA
    Becker, DB
    Govier, DP
    Marsh, JL
    Kane, AA
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 114 (07) : 1695 - 1703
  • [6] Change in Mandibular Position in Patients With Syndromic Craniosynostosis After Midfacial Advancement With Distraction Osteogenesis
    Ali, Naeem
    Brustowicz, Katherine
    Hosomura, Naoshi
    Bruun, Richard A.
    Padwa, Bonnie L.
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (05): : 506 - 511
  • [7] Piezosurgical Suturectomy and Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis for the Treatment of Unilateral Coronal Synostosis
    Shen, Weiming
    Cui, Jie
    Chen, Jianbin
    Buffoli, Barbara
    Rodella, Luigi Fabrizio
    Zou, Jijun
    Ji, Yi
    Chen, Haini
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (08)
  • [8] A Posterior Rotational Flap Technique Using Distraction Osteogenesis for Unilateral Lambdoid Craniosynostosis
    Kamel, George N.
    McKee, Ryan M.
    Carbulido, Kristine
    Modi, Rishi
    Belza, Caitlyn
    Ewing, Emily
    Segal, Rachel M.
    O'Connor, Alyson
    Gholami, Parham
    Ryan, Justin
    Lance, Samuel H.
    Gosman, Amanda A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (04) : 1365 - 1369
  • [9] A New Approach for the Treatment of Unilateral Coronal Synostosis Based on Distraction Osteogenesis
    Taylor, Jesse A.
    Tahiri, Youssef
    Paliga, J. Thomas
    Heuer, Greg G.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (01) : 176E - 178E
  • [10] The Use of Distraction Osteogenesis in the Treatment of Rickets-Associated Craniosynostosis
    D'Agostino, Erin
    Calnan, Daniel R.
    Whitson, Wesley
    Stotland, Mitchell
    Bauer, David F.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 131 : 200 - 206