Defining the information needs of lung cancer screening participants: a qualitative study

被引:11
|
作者
Ruparel, Mamta [1 ]
Quaife, Samantha [2 ]
Baldwin, David [3 ]
Waller, Jo [2 ,4 ]
Janes, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Lungs Living Res Ctr, UCL Resp, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Behav Sci & Hlth, London, England
[3] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Resp Med Unit, David Evans Res Ctr, Nottingham, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Canc Prevent Grp, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
PATIENT PERSPECTIVES; SMOKING; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTIONS; PREFERENCES; ATTITUDES; MORTALITY; DISTRESS; VETERANS; BRITAIN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000448
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Lung cancer screening (LCS) by low-dose CT has been shown to improve mortality, but individuals must consider the potential benefits and harms before making an informed decision about taking part. Shared decision-making is required for LCS in USA, though screening-eligible individuals' specific views of these harms, and their preferences for accessing this information, are not well described. Methods In this qualitative study, we aimed to explore knowledge and perceptions around lung cancer and LCS with a focus on harms. We carried out seven focus groups with screening-eligible individuals, which were divided into current versus former smokers and lower versus higher educational backgrounds; and 16 interviews with health professionals including general practitioners, respiratory physicians, lung cancer nurse specialists and public health consultants. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were coded inductively and analysed using the framework method. Results Fatalistic views about lung cancer as an incurable disease dominated, particularly among current smokers, and participants were often unaware of curative treatment options. Despite this, beliefs that screening is sensible and worthwhile were expressed. Generally participants felt they had the `right' to an informed decision, though some cautioned against information overload. The potential harms of LCS were poorly understood, particularly overdiagnosis and radiation exposure, but participants were unlikely to be deterred by them. Strong concerns about false-negative results were expressed, while false-positive results and indeterminate nodules were also reported as concerning. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the need for LCS information materials to highlight information on the benefits of early detection and options for curative treatment, while accurately presenting the possible harms. Information needs are likely to vary between individuals and we recommend simple information materials to be made available to all individuals considering participating in LCS, with signposting to more detailed information for those who require it.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Focus Group and Interview Study to Explore the Information-Needs of Lung Cancer Screening Participants
    Ruparel, M.
    Quaife, S.
    Baldwin, D.
    Janes, S.
    Waller, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 (10) : S790 - S790
  • [2] Bowel cancer screening in England: A qualitative study of GPs' attitudes and information needs
    Woodrow C.
    Rozmovits L.
    Hewitson P.
    Rose P.
    Austoker J.
    Watson E.
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 7 (1)
  • [3] A Qualitative Study of Lung Cancer Risk Perceptions and Smoking Beliefs Among National Lung Screening Trial Participants
    Park, Elyse R.
    Streck, Joanna M.
    Gareen, Ilana F.
    Ostroff, Jamie S.
    Hyland, Kelly A.
    Rigotti, Nancy A.
    Pajolek, Hannah
    Nichter, Mark
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [4] Characteristics and motivations of participants in a lung cancer screening study.
    Zafar, Y
    Kleykamp, B
    Foraida, M
    Neu, J
    Buncher, R
    Shipley, R
    Jazieh, AR
    Howington, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 104S - 104S
  • [5] Characteristics of lung cancer screening participants
    Joyce, M
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2005, 32 (02) : 483 - 483
  • [6] PARTICIPANTS' MOTIVATION FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN JAPAN: A SECONDARY QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Hamashima, C.
    Hamashima, Y.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S226 - S227
  • [7] Information needs of Malaysian parents of children with cancer: A qualitative study
    Tan, Chai-Eng
    Lau, Sie Chong Doris
    Latiff, Zarina Abdul
    Lee, Chee Chan
    Teh, Kok Hoi
    Sidik, Sherina Mohd
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2022, 9 (03) : 143 - 152
  • [8] Health information needs of families at childhood cancer: A qualitative study
    Koohkan, Elham
    Yousofian, Saeed
    Rajabi, Gholamreza
    Zare-Farashbandi, Firoozeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [9] "You just need to learn": A qualitative study on the information needs of family caregivers of people with lung cancer
    Cochrane, Andreanne
    Gallagher, Pamela
    Dunne, Simon
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2022, 56
  • [10] Lung cancer survival and comorbidities in lung cancer screening participants of the Gdansk screening cohort
    Ostrowski, Marcin
    Marczyk, Michal
    Dziedzic, Robert
    Jelitto-Gorska, Malgorzata
    Marjanski, Tomasz
    Pisiak, Sylwia
    Jedrzejczyk, Tadeusz
    Polanska, Joanna
    Zdrojewski, Tomasz
    Wojtyniak, Bogdan
    Rzyman, Witold
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 (06): : 1114 - 1117