Comparative analysis of the interactions between the FLEGT and REDD plus regimes in Cameroon and the Republic of Congo

被引:13
|
作者
Tegegne, Y. T. [1 ,3 ]
Ochieng, R. M. [2 ]
Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. [2 ]
Lindner, M. [1 ]
Fobissie, K. B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] European Forest Inst, Joensuu 80100, Finland
[2] Wageningen Univ, Forest & Nat Conservat Policy Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Sci, Viikki Trop Resources Inst VITRI, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[4] WWF Cent Africa Reg Programme Off, Yaounde, Cameroon
关键词
Congo Basin; regime interaction; FLEGT; REDD; forest governance;
D O I
10.1505/146554814814095311
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This paper aims to examine and compare the interactions between policy to combat illegal logging (FLEGT VPA) and avoiding deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Cameroon and the Republic of the Congo by applying an institutional interaction approach. Several interactions have occurred between the two regimes, and more interactions are expected. In both countries, the process for developing the VPA has served as a policy model for designing elements of REDD+. Overlaps in issue-areas and membership triggered these interactions. Implementation of the VPA is also expected to result in positive behavioural change among forest stakeholders that could in turn have positive impacts on REDD+. There are also disruptive interactions, such as the slow pace of VPA implementation affecting REDD+ progress in both countries. Furthermore, there is substantial similarity in terms of the nature and quality of interactions between Cameroon and Congo. Building understanding and exchange of information among stakeholders and request for assistance and jurisdictional delimitation could enhance synergies and mitigate disruptive interactions between the two regimes in both countries.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 614
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REDD plus Policy Approaches in the Congo Basin: A Comparative Analysis of Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
    Fobissie, Kalame
    Alemagi, Dieudonne
    Minang, Peter A.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2014, 5 (10): : 2400 - 2424
  • [3] Discourses of FLEGT and REDD plus Regimes in Cameroon: A Nongovernmental Organization and International Development Agency Perspectives
    Mbatu, Richard S.
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (02):
  • [4] A comparative analysis of the institutional capacity of FLEGT VPA in Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Ghana, Liberia, and the Republic of the Congo
    Adams, Marshall Alhassan
    Kayira, Jean
    Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle
    Gruber, James S.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 112 (112)
  • [5] Synergies among social safeguards in FLEGT and REDD plus in Cameroon
    Tegegne, Yitagesu T.
    Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta
    Fobissie, Kalame
    Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J.
    Lindner, Marcus
    Kanninen, Markku
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 75 : 1 - 11
  • [6] Implementing REDD plus in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An analysis of the emerging national REDD plus governance structure
    Aquino, Andre
    Guay, Bruno
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 71 - 79
  • [7] Access to information and local democracies: a case study of REDD plus and FLEGT/VPA in Cameroon
    Carodenuto, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2019, 21 (03) : 267 - 278
  • [8] Institutional analysis of causes of deforestation in REDD plus pilot sites in the Equateur province: Implication for REDD plus in the Democratic Republic of Congo
    Samndong, Raymond Achu
    Bush, Glenn
    Vatn, Arild
    Chapman, Melissa
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 76 : 664 - 674
  • [9] Competing Tenures: Implications for REDD plus in the Democratic Republic of Congo
    Samndong, Raymond Achu
    Vatn, Arild
    [J]. FORESTS, 2018, 9 (11)
  • [10] Interaction between the FLEGT-VPA and REDD plus in Ghana: Recommendations for interaction management
    Ochieng, Robert M.
    Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid J.
    Nketiah, Kwabena S.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 32 : 32 - 39