Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Endoscopic Stone Removal for Acute Cholangitis Associated with Choledocholithiasis

被引:13
|
作者
Sato, Junya [1 ]
Nakahara, Kazunari [1 ]
Morita, Ryo [1 ]
Morita, Nozomi [1 ]
Suetani, Keigo [1 ]
Michikawa, Yosuke [1 ]
Kobayashi, Shinjiro [2 ]
Itoh, Fumio [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marianna Univ, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sch Med, Miyamae Ku, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
[2] St Marianna Univ, Dept Gastroenterol & Gen Surg, Sch Med, Miyamae Ku, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
关键词
SPHINCTEROTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1155/2018/3145107
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims. In early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis, it is unclear that single-session stone removal can be safely performed. We examined the efficacy and safety of early single-session stone removal for mild-to-moderate acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis. Methods. Among patients with mild-to-moderate acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis who underwent early ERCP (n - 167), we retrospectively compared the removal group (patients who underwent single-session stone removal; n = 78) with the drainage group (patients who underwent biliary drainage alone; n = 89) and examined the effectiveness and safety of single-session stone removal by early ERCP. Results. The patients in the removal group had significantly fewer and smaller stones compared with those in the drainage group. The single-session complete stone removal rate was 85.9% in the removal group. The complication rate in early ERCP was 11.5% in the removal group and 10.1% in the drainage group, with no significant difference (P = 0.963). On comparing patients who underwent early endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) with those who underwent elective EST after cholangitis had improved, the post-EST bleeding rates were 6.8% and 2.7%, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.600). The mean duration of hospitalization was 11.9 days for the removal group and 19.9 days for the drainage group, indicating a shorter stay for the removal group (P < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, stone removal in early ERCP, number of stones, and C-reactive protein level were significant predictors of hospitalization period. Conclusions. Single-session stone removal for mild-to-moderate acute cholangitis can be safely performed. It is useful from the perspective of shorter hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early and Direct Endoscopic Stone Removal in the Moderate Grade of Acute Cholangitis with Choledocholithiasis Was Safe and Effective: A Prospective Study
    Liang, Chih-Ming
    Chiu, Yi-Chun
    Lu, Lung-Sheng
    Wu, Cheng-Kun
    Sou, Fai-Meng
    Chiu, Shao-Ming
    Lee, Yu-Chi
    Huang, Pao-Yuan
    Chuah, Seng-Kee
    Kuo, Chung-Mou
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [2] Simplified single-session EUS-guided transhepatic antegrade stone removal for management of choledocholithiasis in patients with surgically altered anatomy
    Yu, Tingting
    Hou, Suning
    Du, Haiming
    Zhang, Wei
    Tian, Jiao
    Hou, Yankun
    Yao, Jun
    Hou, Senlin
    Zhang, Lichao
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2024, 12
  • [3] Safety of immediate endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute suppurative cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis
    Ito, Tomoyasu
    Sai, Jin Kan
    Okubo, Hironao
    Saito, Hiroaki
    Ishii, Shigeto
    Kanazawa, Ryo
    Tomishima, Ko
    Watanabe, Sumio
    Shiina, Shuichiro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 8 (03): : 180 - 185
  • [4] Single-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage combined with ERCP for acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis in a nonsurgical patient
    Villarroel, Mariano
    de la Serna-Higuera, Carlos
    Perez-Miranda, Manuel
    ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (07) : E275 - E276
  • [5] ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLANGITIS DUE TO CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS
    DITZEL, H
    DEMUCKADELL, OBS
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 37 (02) : 204 - 207
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of one-stage endoscopic treatment for ascending acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis with severe comorbidities
    Zhang, Xiaoping
    Li, Guiqin
    Pan, Liang
    Chen, Yue
    Shi, Ruihua
    Xu, Wei
    Zhou, Kun
    Cheng, Yajun
    Feng, Yadong
    Zhou, Aijun
    Zhao, Kai
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (09): : 3963 - 3970
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of one-stage endoscopic treatment for ascending acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis with severe comorbidities
    Xiaoping Zhang
    Guiqin Li
    Liang Pan
    Yue Chen
    Ruihua Shi
    Wei Xu
    Kun Zhou
    Yajun Cheng
    Yadong Feng
    Aijun Zhou
    Kai Zhao
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 3963 - 3970
  • [8] Safety and Utility of Single-Session Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for the Evaluation of Pancreatobiliary Diseases
    Kawakubo, Kazumichi
    Kawakami, Hiroshi
    Kuwatani, Masaki
    Haba, Shin
    Kudo, Taiki
    Abe, Yoko
    Kawahata, Shuhei
    Onodera, Manabu
    Ehira, Nobuyuki
    Yamato, Hiroaki
    Eto, Kazunori
    Sakamoto, Naoya
    GUT AND LIVER, 2014, 8 (03) : 329 - 332
  • [9] The Efficacy and Safety of Single-Session Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Masses
    Noma, Yasuhiro
    Kawamoto, Hirofumi
    Kato, Hironari
    Iwamuro, Masaya
    Hirao, Ken
    Fujii, Masakuni
    Tsutsumi, Koichiro
    Horiguchi, Shigeru
    Yamamoto, Naoki
    Sakakihara, Ichiro
    Tomoda, Takeshi
    Matsumoto, Kazuyuki
    Okada, Hiroyuki
    Yamamoto, Kazuhide
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 61 (134) : 1775 - 1779
  • [10] Single-session laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP: a valid option for the management of choledocholithiasis
    Mallick, Reema
    Rank, Kevin
    Ronstrom, Carrie
    Amateau, Stuart K.
    Arain, Mustafa
    Attam, Rajeev
    Freeman, Martin L.
    Harmon, James V.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 84 (04) : 639 - 645