Qualification and Reliability Standards for Photonic Component Technologies

被引:0
|
作者
Bensoussan, Alain [1 ]
机构
[1] Thales Alenia Space France, Competence Ctr Elect, Dept Parts & Logist, F-31037 Toulouse, France
关键词
Optoelectronics; Reliability; DfR; Qualification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
From optoelectronics commercial systems through aerospace applications, new technologies based equipment must be designed taking into account reliability risks. Existing qualification standards and processes have been developed from field return "lessons learned". The qualification methods have been built-up to take into account questions and concerns observed on previous well established processes. Is this approach applicable to new products and materials? How will new optoelectronic technologies, nanotechnologies, and new packaging techniques perform when tested under conditions defined in existing standards? Are the Aerospace and Military standards adequate to validate long term application and proof of reliability for the new devices? What is missing, and what is needed? Should we modify the methodology for qualifying new parts based on these innovative technologies? What is needed for implementing efficiently and just in time High Reliability application processes? Evolving methodology may be one solution but must be constructed based on results of experiments from FOAT (Failure Oriented Accelerated Testing) and QT (Qualification Testing) for new technologies. This presentation gives an overview of general issues of microelectronics when employed in harsh environments (electrical, optical, thermal, mechanical, radiation). Understanding the need, defining goals, accumulating field failure data, developing reliability models and educating our customers is a recommended approach to develop comprehensive FOAT and QT programs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oxide VCSEL reliability qualification at Agilent Technologies
    Herrick, RW
    VERTICAL-CAVITY SURFACE-EMITTING LASERS VI, 2002, 4649 : 130 - 141
  • [2] Reliability Considerations for the Qualification of Leading Edge CMOS Technologies
    Guarin, F.
    2019 NINETEENTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON JUNCTION TECHNOLOGY (IWJT), 2019,
  • [3] Integrated Microwave Photonic Component Technologies
    Klamkin, Jonathan
    Liu, Yuan
    Song, Bowen
    Sang, Fengqiao
    Isaac, Brandon
    2018 CONFERENCE ON LASERS AND ELECTRO-OPTICS (CLEO), 2018,
  • [4] PHOTONIC COMPONENT AND SUBSYSTEM RELIABILITY MODELING
    Nicholls, David
    Avak, Anthony
    Mazurowski, John
    2008 IEEE AVIONICS, FIBER-OPTICS AND PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, 2008, : 49 - +
  • [5] Reliability and qualification of an integrated MEMS attenuator for optical component applications
    Hickey, R
    Fettig, H
    Wylde, J
    Legros, SJ
    Mallard, R
    Nentwich, H
    Hart, C
    RELIABILITY, TESTING, AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MEMS/MOEMS II, 2003, 4980 : 309 - 316
  • [6] Telcordia qualification and beyond: reliability of today's polymer photonic components
    Eldada, L
    Organic Photonic Materials and Devices VII, 2005, 5724 : 96 - 106
  • [7] Review of the reliability of advanced component packaging technologies
    Németh, P
    Illyefalvi-Vitéz, Z
    Harsányi, G
    50TH ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS & TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE - 2000 PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 1605 - 1609
  • [8] Photonic component qualification and implementation activities at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
    Ott, Melanie N.
    Jin, Xiaodan Linda
    Chuska, Richard F.
    LaRocca, Frank V.
    Macmurphy, Shawn L.
    Matuszeski, Adam J.
    Zellar, Ronald S.
    Friedberg, Patricia R.
    Malenab, Mary C.
    PHOTONICS FOR SPACE ENVIRONMENTS XI, 2006, 6308
  • [9] Virtual component qualification
    Pecht, M
    Sandborn, P
    McCluskey, P
    1999 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING AND SIMULATION OF MICROSYSTEMS, 1999, : 8 - 13
  • [10] SOFTWARE QUALIFICATION AND RELIABILITY
    DECROIX, A
    ACTA ELECTRONICA, 1983, 25 (01): : 45 - 51