Grow Online: feasibility and proof of concept study

被引:0
|
作者
Chesnut, Ryan P. [1 ]
Czymoniewicz-Klippel, Melina [2 ]
DiNallo, Jennifer M. [2 ]
Perkins, Daniel F. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Clearinghouse Mil Family Readiness, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Biobehav Hlth Dept, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ Sociol & Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Health promotion; Feasibility; Child well-being; Digital delivery methods; Parent-focused interventions; Proof of concept; PAPER-AND-PENCIL; FAMILY SUPPORT; UNITED-STATES; PARENT; CHILDREN; BEHAVIORS; SOCIALIZATION; INTERVENTIONS; PROGRAMS; MOTHERS;
D O I
10.1108/JCS-10-2018-0026
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Purpose Digitally delivered, parent-focused interventions (DD-PFIs) are viewed as an important method for supporting child well-being. Few DD-PFIs include health-promotion and general-parenting content, and only some are intended for a universal audience. The purpose of this paper is to focus on a preliminary evaluation of Grow Online, which was designed to address this gap. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design, including pretests and posttests and semi-structured interviews, was employed to evaluate program feasibility and demonstrate proof of concept. Findings Feasibility findings were favorable, which indicates participants were satisfied with the program, liked the main program features, found the content helpful and had a positive experience using the website. Initial recruitment was strong, and engagement with the sessions was high; however, retention was poor with a 73.5 percent attrition rate. Significant pre- to post-changes were found on measures of over-reactive discipline, parenting efficacy, emotion coaching, coping socialization, child physical activity support, rewarding eating and child externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Research limitations/implications - Study design and high attrition limit the ability to infer causality and generalize beyond the sample. Practical implications - Providing support to parents through a universal health-promoting DD-PFI is viable, though issues involving retention need to be given full consideration. Originality/value Parents use of technology to access child care information is increasing, but most information online is not evidence-informed. Grow Online fills an important gap in the research and practice of DD-PFIs, and this study's findings suggest a more rigorous evaluation is merited.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 42
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Grow parenting program: demonstrating proof of concept
    Chesnut, Ryan
    DiNallo, Jennifer M.
    Czymoniewicz-Klippel, Melina T.
    Perkins, Daniel F.
    HEALTH EDUCATION, 2018, 118 (05) : 413 - 430
  • [2] Proof of Concept for Implantable Oximetry. Results of a Feasibility Study
    Lellouche, F.
    Bouchard, P.
    Karimi, M.
    Juteau, N.
    Mascret, Q.
    Bharucha, E.
    Ugalde, P.
    Clavel, M.
    Beaudoin, J.
    L'Her, E.
    Gosselin, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [3] Designing optimal spectral indices: a feasibility and proof of concept study
    Govaerts, YM
    Verstraete, MM
    Pinty, B
    Gobron, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 20 (09) : 1853 - 1873
  • [4] Microvascular reactivity in anesthetized cats: feasibility and proof of concept study
    Liao, Pen-Ting
    Tillson, Michael
    Clark-Price, Stuart
    Kuo, Kendon
    Gerken, Katherine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2025, 86 (01)
  • [5] Proof of Concept, Feasibility, and Efficacy Trials
    Chandelia, Sudha
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (09) : E731 - E732
  • [6] Single Bacteria Movement Tracking by Online Microscopy - A Proof of Concept Study
    Ziegler, Andreas
    Schock-Kusch, Daniel
    Bopp, Dominik
    Dounia, Sandra
    Raedle, Matthias
    Stahl, Ulf
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [7] Combating Misinformation Online: Identification of Variables and Proof-of-Concept Study
    Dordevic, Milan
    Safieddine, Fadi
    Masri, Wassim
    Pourghomi, Pardis
    SOCIAL MEDIA: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY, 2016, 9844 : 442 - 454
  • [8] Proof of Concept, Feasibility, and Efficacy Trials Reply
    de Vries, Heder J.
    de Grooth, Harm Jan
    Heunks, Leo M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (09) : E732 - E734
  • [9] Pilot feasibility study of cognitive training exercises for Egyptian adults: Proof of concept
    Tawfik, Heba M.
    Tsatali, Marianna
    Hassanin, Hany I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 37 (01)
  • [10] Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft nonunion risk: a feasibility and proof of concept study
    Oliver, William M.
    Nicholson, Jamie A.
    Bell, Katrina R.
    Carter, Thomas H.
    White, Timothy O.
    Clement, Nicholas D.
    Duckworth, Andrew D.
    Simpson, A. Hamish R. W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02): : 909 - 918