Cost-benefit analysis of sumatriptan tablets versus usual therapy for treatment of migraine

被引:12
|
作者
Biddle, AK
Shih, YCT
Kwong, WJ
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Pharm, Div Pharmaceut Policy & Evaluat Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] MEDTAP Int Inc, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, US Med Affairs Hlth Outcomes, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2000年 / 20卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1592/phco.20.17.1356.34890
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We performed a systematic assessment of the costs and benefits of sumatriptan and usual therapy for migraine from society's perspective. A decision tree was constructed with probability estimates based on data from an open-label clinical trial assessing the economic and human impacts of sumatriptan and usual therapy on nursing personnel. Direct medical care costs including costs for drug, physician, and emergency room visits were considered. Benefits were estimated using the human capital approach based on the national average of weekly earnings and productivity loss estimated from a migraine clinical trial. The net benefits of sumatriptan and usual therapy for the treatment of a single migraine attack were estimated to be $50 and $20, respectively. The annual incremental net benefit of sumatriptan over usual therapy was estimated to be $114-540/patient. The price difference was offset by benefits of sumatriptan in reducing use of health care resources and productivity loss.
引用
收藏
页码:1356 / 1364
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of sumatriptan in patients with migraine
    Lofland, JH
    Kim, SS
    Batenhorst, AS
    Johnson, NE
    Chatterton, ML
    Cady, RK
    Kaniecki, R
    Nash, DB
    [J]. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 76 (11) : 1093 - 1101
  • [2] Costs, benefits, and cost-benefit of Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality versus enhanced treatment as usual
    McCutchan, Phoebe K.
    Yates, Brian T.
    Jobes, David A.
    Kerbrat, Amanda H.
    Comtois, Katherine Anne
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [3] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY
    Layard, R.
    Clark, D.
    Knapp, M.
    Mayraz, G.
    [J]. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 202 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [4] Treatment of persistent migraine with sumatriptan tablets.
    Nett, R
    O'Quinn, S
    Putnam, G
    Wentz, A
    [J]. CEPHALALGIA, 1999, 19 (04) : 360 - 361
  • [5] TREATMENT OF INCOMMENSURABLES IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BRANDL, JE
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1968, 44 (04) : 523 - 525
  • [6] TREATMENT OF INCOMMENSURABLES IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    DEVINE, EJ
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1966, 42 (03) : 383 - 387
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness analysis of rizatriptan and sumatriptan versus Cafergot in the acute treatment of migraine
    Zhang, L
    Hay, JW
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (03) : 289 - 289
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of rizatriptan and sumatriptan versus Cafergot® in the acute treatment of migraine
    Zhang, LH
    Hay, JW
    [J]. CNS DRUGS, 2005, 19 (07) : 635 - 642
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rizatriptan and Sumatriptan versus Cafergot® in the Acute Treatment of Migraine
    Lihua Zhang
    Joel W. Hay
    [J]. CNS Drugs, 2005, 19 : 635 - 642
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis of lipid lowering therapy
    Jonsson, B
    Johannesson, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 18 (01) : 165 - 166