MOOCs for all: Evaluating the accessibility of top MOOC platforms

被引:0
|
作者
Martin, Jose L. [1 ]
Amado-Salvatierra, Hector R. [2 ]
Hilera, Jose R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Inst Ciencias Educ, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Galileo, Dept GES, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[3] Univ Alcala, Dept Ciencias Computac, Alcala De Henares, Spain
关键词
web content accessibility; usability; disability; WCAG; 2.0; MOOC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Nowadays, experiences with massive open online courses (MOOCs) are being part of modern engineering degrees, thus providing practical interactive activities to improve teaching-learning strategies with online courses and social community learning with peers from different countries. Additionally, this MOOC movement is being identified as a valuable tool to provide engineering education to all students, including students with disabilities that for different reasons cannot be part of a face-to-face session and, naturally, have the rights to make use of this myriad of teaching-learning strategies. In this sense, if a teacher wants to develop a MOOC course or to recommend a course to his students, it is imperative to identify the best accessible platforms in order to provide inclusive learning strategies. The aim of this study is to analyze the accessibility of a selection of eight popular MOOC platforms: Coursera, edX, Udacity, MiriadaX, UNED COMA, Udemy, Futurelearn and NovoEd. To this end, three automatic accessibility evaluation tools have been used: eXaminator, FAE and Tingtun. Hence, it has been checked the degree of conformance of these platforms with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) created by the World Wide Consortium and adopted by ISO as an international standard. The study has been complemented with a heuristic evaluation by experts in order to have a holistic perspective of MOOC accessibility. The idea behind this study is that the stakeholders in the teaching-learning process will be able to identify and select the most inclusive platform based on the international standards. Moreover, the technical staff in educational institutions will be provided with a procedure to identify accessibility issues in other platforms and engineering teachers will be aware of the potential obstacles that students with disabilities may experience. The results of this study identify edX and Futurelearn as the best MOOC platforms. Finally, conclusions and future work ideas are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:2274 / 2283
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MOOCs for all: Evaluating the accessibility of top MOOC platforms
    Martín, José L.
    Amado-Salvatierra, Héctor R.
    Hilera, José R.
    [J]. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2021, 32 (5B) : 2274 - 2283
  • [2] MOOCs Lack Interactivity and Collaborativeness: Evaluating MOOC Platforms
    Gamage, Dilrukshi
    Perera, Indika
    Fernando, Shantha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2020, 10 (02): : 94 - 111
  • [3] The Accessibility of MOOC Platforms from Instructors' Perspective
    Sanderson, Norun C.
    Chen, Weiqin
    Bong, Way Kiat
    Kessel, Siri
    [J]. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: USERS AND CONTEXT DIVERSITY, PT III, 2016, 9739 : 124 - 134
  • [4] Accessibility of MOOCs
    Bohnsack, Marco
    Puhl, Steffen
    [J]. COMPUTERS HELPING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, ICCHP 2014, PT I, 2014, 8547 : 141 - 144
  • [5] Performance of students with different accessibility needs and preferences in "Design for All" MOOCs
    Rodriguez-Ascaso, Alejandro
    Molanes-Lopez, Elisa M.
    Perez-Martin, Jorge
    Leton, Emilio
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
  • [6] Assessment of Video Accessibility by Students of a MOOC on Digital Materials for All
    Molanes-Lopez, Elisa M.
    Rodriguez-Ascaso, Alejandro
    Leton, Emilio
    Perez-Martin, Jorge
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 72357 - 72367
  • [7] Accessibility assessment of MOOC platforms in Spanish: UNED COMA, COLMENIA and Miriada X
    Iniesto, Francisco
    Rodrigo, Covadonga
    [J]. 2014 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), 2014, : 169 - 172
  • [8] The Accessibility of MOOCs for Blind Learners
    Krolak, Aleksandra
    Chen, Weiqin
    Sanderson, Norun C.
    Kessel, Siri
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY (ASSETS'17), 2017, : 401 - 402
  • [9] Evaluating State of Web Accessibility Standards in Top Airline Websites
    Pant, Mukesh
    Sinha, Abhirup
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL IOT, ELECTRONICS AND MECHATRONICS CONFERENCE (IEMTRONICS 2020), 2020, : 490 - 494
  • [10] MOOC Openness - Are MOOCs as Open as They Should Be?
    Mihaescu, V
    [J]. SMART 2014 - SOCIAL MEDIA IN ACADEMIA: RESEARCH AND TEACHING, 2015, : 395 - 400