Randomized controlled trial of SystemCHANGE™ weight management intervention in neurological conditions

被引:5
|
作者
Plow, Matthew [1 ]
Moore, Shirley M. [2 ]
Chang, Julia [2 ]
Bachhal, Emrose [3 ]
Sparks, Kenneth E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Frances Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Univ Hosp, Dahms Clin Res Unit, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Cleveland State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Serv, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Obesity; Multiple sclerosis; Stroke; Physical activity; Behavior change; Self-management; Ecological frameworks; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; NUTRITIONAL BEHAVIORS; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; DISABILITY SURVEY; ADULTS; EFFICACY; OBESITY; EXERCISE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: This randomized controlled pilot study examined the feasibility and efficacy of a SystemCHANGE (TM) (SC) weight management intervention in adults with either multiple sclerosis or stroke. Methods: Participants (n = 61) were randomized into two interventions: SC, which taught skills to modify personal environments, or active-control (AC), which taught health behavior guidelines. Sessions were held weekly for 12 weeks. Feasibility measures included recruitment and attrition rates. The primary outcome of body weight and secondary outcomes of emotional well-being and healthy behaviors were measured before and after the interventions. Results: Average recruitment rate was 3.6 participants per month. Attrition rate was 14.8%. On average, 9.1 sessions were completed for SC and 10.7 for AC. Differences in weight loss were non-significant between interventions (P = 0.182), but significantly declined across both interventions (P = 0.011). Physical activity (P = 0.002), depression (P < 0.001), anxiety (P = 0.023), and self-efficacy (P = 0.022) all significantly improved for SC compared to AC. Conclusions: SC was feasible to implement and efficacious in improving secondary outcomes of emotional well-being and healthy behaviors, but was not efficacious in improving the primary outcome of weight loss. More research is needed to optimize SC. Practice implications: SC might be an alternative approach to cognitive-behavioral therapy for promoting emotional well-being and healthy behaviors. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized controlled pilot study of a SystemCHANGE™ weight management intervention in stroke survivors: rationale and protocol
    Matthew Plow
    Shirley M Moore
    John P Kirwan
    Fredrick Frost
    Irene Katzan
    Sue Jaeger
    Jay Alberts
    [J]. Trials, 14
  • [2] Randomized controlled pilot study of a SystemCHANGE™ weight management intervention in stroke survivors: rationale and protocol
    Plow, Matthew
    Moore, Shirley M.
    Kirwan, John P.
    Frost, Fredrick
    Katzan, Irene
    Jaeger, Sue
    Alberts, Jay
    [J]. TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [3] Randomized Controlled Trial of the SystemCHANGE Intervention on Behaviors Related to Cardiovascular Risk in HIV plus Adults
    Webel, Allison R.
    Moore, Shirley M.
    Longenecker, Chris T.
    Currie, Jackson
    Davey, Christine Horvat
    Perazzo, Joseph
    Sattar, Abdus
    Josephson, Richard A.
    [J]. JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2018, 78 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [4] The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial
    Patrícia Pinheiro de Freitas
    Mariana Carvalho de Menezes
    Luana Caroline dos Santos
    Adriano Marçal Pimenta
    Adaliene Versiani Matos Ferreira
    Aline Cristine Souza Lopes
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 20
  • [5] The transtheoretical model is an effective weight management intervention: a randomized controlled trial
    de Freitas, Patricia Pinheiro
    de Menezes, Mariana Carvalho
    dos Santos, Luana Caroline
    Pimenta, Adriano Marcal
    Matos Ferreira, Adaliene Versiani
    Souza Lopes, Aline Cristine
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Telehealth Weight Management Intervention for Adults with Physical Disabilities A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rimmer, James H.
    Wang, Edward
    Pellegrini, Christine A.
    Lullo, Carolyn
    Gerber, Ben S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2013, 92 (12) : 1084 - 1094
  • [7] The EVO study protocol for a randomized controlled evaluation trial of an optimized weight management intervention
    Pfammatter, Angela Fidler
    Battalio, Samuel L.
    Olvera, Charlie
    DeZelar, Margaret
    Moore, Dominique
    Scanlan, Laura
    Siddique, Juned
    Spring, Bonnie
    Chang, Su-Hsin
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 116
  • [8] A brief intervention for weight management in primary care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Amanda Lewis
    Kate Jolly
    Peymane Adab
    Amanda Daley
    Amanda Farley
    Susan Jebb
    Deborah Lycett
    Sarah Clarke
    Anna Christian
    Jing Jin
    Ben Thompson
    Paul Aveyard
    [J]. Trials, 14
  • [9] A brief intervention for weight management in primary care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Lewis, Amanda
    Jolly, Kate
    Adab, Peymane
    Daley, Amanda
    Farley, Amanda
    Jebb, Susan
    Lycett, Deborah
    Clarke, Sarah
    Christian, Anna
    Jin, Jing
    Thompson, Ben
    Aveyard, Paul
    [J]. TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [10] The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a community weight management intervention: A randomized controlled trial of the health weight management demonstration
    Hersey, James C.
    Khavjou, Olga
    Strange, Laura B.
    Atkinson, Richard L.
    Blair, Steven N.
    Campbell, Susan
    Hobbs, Connie L.
    Kelly, Bridget
    Fitzgerald, Tania M.
    Kish-Doto, Julia
    Koch, Matthew A.
    Munoz, Breda
    Peele, Eric
    Stockdale, Jason
    Augustine, Cynthia
    Mitchell, Glenda
    Arday, David
    Kugler, John
    Dorn, Patricia
    Ellzy, James
    Julian, Regina
    Grissom, Joyce
    Britt, Marcia
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 54 (01) : 42 - 49