Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks (VBI Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

被引:4
|
作者
Mitchell, Joanna [1 ]
Hardeman, Wendy [2 ]
Pears, Sally [1 ]
Vasconcelos, Joana C. [3 ]
Prevost, A. Toby [3 ]
Wilson, Ed [4 ]
Sutton, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Inst Publ Hlth, Behav Sci Grp,Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Forvie Site,Box 113Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Hlth Sci, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Imperial Clin Trials Unit, Stadium House,68 Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Forvie Site,Box 113Cambridge Biomed Campus, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Accelerometry; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Pedometer; Physical activity; Primary health care; Randomised controlled trial; Very brief intervention;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-016-1413-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Physical activity interventions that are targeted at individuals can be effective in encouraging people to be more physically active. However, most such interventions are too long or complex and not scalable to the general population. This trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention when delivered as part of preventative health checks in primary care (National Health Service (NHS) Health Check). Methods/design: The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial is a two parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation and follow-up at 3 months. A total of 1,140 participants will be recruited from 23 primary care practices in the east of England. Participants eligible for an NHS Health Check and who are considered suitable to take part by their doctor and able to provide written informed consent are eligible for the trial. Participants are randomly assigned at the beginning of the NHS Health Check to either 1) the control arm, in which they receive only the NHS Health Check, or 2) the intervention arm, in which they receive the NHS Health Check plus 'Step It Up' (a very brief intervention that can be delivered in 5 minutes by nurses and/or healthcare assistants at the end of the Health Check). 'Step It Up' includes (1) a face-to-face discussion, including feedback on current activity level, recommendations for physical activity, and information on how to use a pedometer, set step goals, and monitor progress; (2) written material supporting the discussion and tips and links to further resources to help increase physical activity; and (3) a pedometer to wear and a step chart for monitoring progress. The primary outcome is accelerometer counts per minute at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the time spent in the different levels of physical activity, self-reported physical activity and economic measures. Trial recruitment is underway. Discussion: The VBI trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Step It Up intervention delivered during NHS Health Checks and will inform policy decisions about introducing very brief interventions into routine primary care practice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks (VBI Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Joanna Mitchell
    Wendy Hardeman
    Sally Pears
    Joana C. Vasconcelos
    A. Toby Prevost
    Ed Wilson
    Stephen Sutton
    [J]. Trials, 17
  • [2] Evaluation of a very brief pedometer-based physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks in England: The VBI randomised controlled trial
    Hardeman, Wendy
    Mitchell, Joanna
    Pears, Sally
    Van Emmenis, Miranda
    Theil, Florence
    Gc, Vijay S.
    Vasconcelos, Joana C.
    Westgate, Kate
    Brage, Soren
    Suhrcke, Marc
    Griffin, Simon J.
    Kinmonth, Ann Louise
    Wilson, Edward C. F.
    Prevost, A. Toby
    Sutton, Stephen
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (03) : e1003046
  • [3] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: A cluster randomised controlled trial
    Corder, Kirsten
    Sharp, Stephen J.
    Jong, Stephanie T.
    Foubister, Campbell
    Brown, Helen Elizabeth
    Wells, Emma K.
    Armitage, Sofie M.
    Croxson, Caroline H. D.
    Vignoles, Anna
    Wilkinson, Paul O.
    Wilson, Edward C. F.
    van Sluijs, Esther M. F.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (07)
  • [4] Effectiveness of alcohol brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists: study protocol of a two-arm randomised controlled trial
    Ranjita Dhital
    Ian Norman
    Cate Whittlesea
    Jim McCambridge
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 13
  • [5] Effectiveness of alcohol brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists: study protocol of a two-arm randomised controlled trial
    Dhital, Ranjita
    Norman, Ian
    Whittlesea, Cate
    McCambridge, Jim
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [6] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Giacco, Domenico
    Chevalier, Agnes
    Patterson, Megan
    Hamborg, Thomas
    Mortimer, Rianna
    Feng, Yan
    Webber, Martin
    Xanthopoulou, Penny
    Priebe, Stefan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [7] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention to improve maternal mental health in the peripartum: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Branjerdporn, Grace
    Gillespie, Kerri
    Martin, Elizabeth
    Kissane, Vivianne
    De Young, Alex
    Ewais, Tatjana
    Goldsmith, Kathleen
    Wilson, Susan
    Adhikary, Sam
    McGahan, Greg
    Schulz, Constanze
    Beckmann, Michael
    [J]. TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [8] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an electronic mindfulness-based intervention to improve maternal mental health in the peripartum: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Grace Branjerdporn
    Kerri Gillespie
    Elizabeth Martin
    Vivianne Kissane
    Alex De Young
    Tatjana Ewais
    Kathleen Goldsmith
    Susan Wilson
    Sam Adhikary
    Greg McGahan
    Constanze Schulz
    Michael Beckmann
    [J]. Trials, 24
  • [9] A pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a physical activity intervention as a treatment for depression: the treating depression with physical activity (TREAD) trial
    Chalder, M.
    Wiles, N. J.
    Campbell, J.
    Hollinghurst, S. P.
    Searle, A.
    Haase, A. M.
    Taylor, A. H.
    Fox, K. R.
    Baxter, H.
    Davis, M.
    Thorp, H.
    Winder, R.
    Wright, C.
    Calnan, M.
    Lawlor, D. A.
    Peters, T. J.
    Sharp, D. J.
    Turner, K. M.
    Montgomery, A. A.
    Lewis, G.
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2012, 16 (10) : 1 - +
  • [10] A cluster randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the ‘Girls Active’ intervention: a study protocol
    C L Edwardson
    D M Harrington
    T Yates
    D H Bodicoat
    K Khunti
    T Gorely
    L B Sherar
    R T Edwards
    C Wright
    K Harrington
    M J Davies
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 15