Percussion tools from early Upper Palaeolithic: Example of Aurignacian and Gravettian sites from the Vezere Valley (Dordogne, France)

被引:1
|
作者
Chiotti, Laurent [1 ]
机构
[1] Museum Natl Hist Nat, CNRS, Hist Nat Homme Prehist HNHP, 20 Rue Moyen Age, FR-24620 Les Eyzies De Tayac, France
关键词
Percussion tool; percussion; Aurignacian; Gravettian; CASTANET;
D O I
10.5852/cr-palevol2021v20a21
中图分类号
Q91 [古生物学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 070903 ;
摘要
The work presented in this paper is the result of a more general study of all the non-flint lithic materials carried out on several sites of the early Upper Paleolithic of the Vezere valley (Dordogne, France). Among the many objects in this category, we present here only those showing traces of percussion use. Although these traces are most often present on river pebbles, other types of materials have also been used, including the re-use of flints originally knapped for something else. The study concerns three Aurignacian rock shelter sites (abri Blanchard and abri Castanet in Sergeac and Abri Cellier in Tursac) and the Final Gravettian levels of two other rock shelter sites (Pataud and Laugerie-Haute in Les Eyzies-de-Tayac). The collections studied have very different origins: collections from old excavations, collection from the spoil of old excavations and current excavations. Thus, these collections are very heterogeneous. Among the studied material, a macroscopic analysis revealed the presence of different categories of percussion tools, corresponding to diverse uses. Among the studied material, a macroscopic analysis revealed the presence of different categories of percussion tools, corresponding to diverse uses: - 82 hammerstones for flint knapping. These are the most numerous. Among them we observe the greatest variability, both in terms of dimensions and raw materials. They are usually medium sized objects: between 50 and 100 mm for a weight of 90 to 500 g. Most are made of quartz, but there is great variability in the choice of raw material including gneiss, granite and quartzite. - 43 pounding stones. They are river pebbles that show much more violent traces of impacts on the extremities or edges, often with splinters, sometimes altering the shape and volume of the support. They are more numerous on the Aurignacian sites. They are always among the biggest river pebbles with traces of percussion: between 80 and 130 mm for a weight of 200 to 900 g. A piece from Castanet measures 1400 g. The raw materials used are almost exclusively quartz and quartzite. - 22 choppers/hammerstones. These are river pebbles with voluntary flake detachments to create more or less sharp ridges, which typologically can be called choppers. They all have very significant percussion and crush marks on their ridges. Most of them come from the Aurignacian sites. They are very similar in traces, dimensions and raw materials to pounding stones and probably had the same use. - 3 soft stone hammerstones. These are two spherical calcareous pieces and a small flint pebble with a very thick and soft cortex. They are among the smallest hammerstones and were probably used for flint knapping. - 20 "maillets" (mallets). According to the definition of S. de Beaune (2000), these are small river pebbles, usually elongated, showing groups of more or less intense percussion marks, which can form a clear depression on the river pebble surface. They have relatively small dimensions: between 60 and 110 mm in length for 20 to 70 mm in width and weights from 20 to 130 g. The raw materials used are varied, but are generally fine-grained and compact rocks (lithographic limestone, diorite, etc.). Quartz is never used. - 49 flint objects reused in percussion. Most of these objects are cores, but there is also one large flake, some carinate scrapers and one carinate scraper rought-out. Some have such intensive percussion marks that the edges have almost completely disappeared, which gives them an almost spherical appearance. With lengths between 30 and 80 mm for a weight of 30 to 300 g, they are among the smallest hammerstones. It is in the Gravettian sites that they are most numerous. We have several hypotheses concerning their uses: as hammerstones for flint knapping, bush-hammers or even lighters. - 9 intermediate pieces. They are all from Castanet. They are quite voluminous flints with traces of percussion and crushing on two opposing areas. In most cases, these traces are relatively less intense. - 25 anvils. These are objects of very varying sizes, weighing from 300 g to several kilos. Many of them have traces of anvil use, but also traces of use as pounding stones, flint knapping hammerstones, cutting supports, grinders or for chopper shaping. Quartz is the dominant material, but almost all the quartz pieces were also used as hammerstones. The five Aurignacian and Final Gravettian sites of the Vezere valley have all delivered quite large quantities of objects bearing use-stigmata of activities related to percussion, with a total of 275 pieces. In addition to being abundant, the percussion material in the five sites is relatively diverse. There are different categories of tools that revealed different uses, not just flint knapping. On the other hand, it appears that for each given type of tool, the uses seem to be the same in both cultures. Among the raw materials used, quartz pebbles are widely used, irrespective of site and culture. Alongside this dominant material, a considerable diversity of materials was selected. This diversity may vary depending on the type of object/use, but also the site/culture.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 400
页数:28
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Aurignacian lithic economy and early modern human mobility: new perspectives from classic sites in the Vezere valley of France
    Blades, BS
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 1999, 37 (01) : 91 - 120
  • [2] Launched percussion in the Early Aurignacian from Bergerac region: some examples from Barbas III, Vieux Coutets, Les Garris and Cantalouette II (Dordogne, France)
    Ortega, Iluminada
    Rios-Garaizar, Joseba
    Bourguignon, Laurence
    COMPTES RENDUS PALEVOL, 2022, 21 (18) : 363 - 389
  • [3] FOSSIL HOMINIDS FROM THE EARLY UPPER PALEOLITHIC (AURIGNACIAN) OF FRANCE
    GAMBIER, D
    HUMAN REVOLUTION: BEHAVIORAL AND BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE ORIGINS OF MODERN HUMANS, 1989, : 194 - 211
  • [4] The role of small prey in human subsistence strategies from Early Upper Palaeolithic sites in Iberia: the rabbits from the Evolved Aurignacian level of Arbreda Cave
    Lloveras, Lluis
    Maroto, Julia
    Soler, Joaquim
    Thomas, Richard
    Moreno-Garcia, Marta
    Nadal, Jordi
    Soler, Narcis
    JOURNAL OF QUATERNARY SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (05) : 458 - 471
  • [5] The recently excavated lithic and osseous assemblages from the Early Aurignacian site of Abri Castanet (Dordogne region, France)
    Pelegrin, J
    O'Farrell, M
    Knecht, H
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2000, 38 (03) : A25 - A25
  • [6] Burning wood or burning bone? A reconsideration of flotation evidence from Upper Palaeolithic (Gravettian) sites in the Moravian Corridor
    Beresford-Jones, David G.
    Johnson, Katherine
    Pullen, Alexander G.
    Pryor, Alexander J. E.
    Svoboda, Jiri
    Jones, Martin K.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 37 (11) : 2799 - 2811
  • [7] A cranial injury from the earliest Gravettian at the Cro-Magnon rock shelter (V⠁ez⠃ere Valley, Dordogne, southwest France)
    Knuesel, Christopher J.
    Thibeault, Adrien
    Villotte, Sebastien
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2023, 177
  • [8] Reindeer specialization in the early Upper Palaeolithic: the evidence from south west France
    Mellars, PA
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 31 (05) : 613 - 617
  • [9] Osseous technology as a reflection of chronological, economic and sociological aspects of Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers: Examples from key Aurignacian and Gravettian sites in South-West Europe
    Goutas, Nejma
    Tejero, Jose-Miguel
    QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 403 : 79 - 89
  • [10] New luminescence dating results based on polymineral fine grains from the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic site of La Ferrassie (Dordogne, SW France)
    Frouin, Marine
    Guerin, Guillaume
    Lahaye, Christelle
    Mercier, Norbert
    Huot, Sebastien
    Aldeias, Vera
    Bruxelles, Laurent
    Chiotti, Laurent
    Dibble, Harold L.
    Goldberg, Paul
    Madelaine, Stephane
    McPherron, Shannon J. P.
    Sandgathe, Dennis
    Steele, Teresa E.
    Turq, Alain
    QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY, 2017, 39 : 131 - 141