Dashboards in Health Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:13
|
作者
Helminski, Danielle [1 ]
Kurlander, Jacob E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Renji, Anjana Deep [4 ]
Sussman, Jeremy B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pfeiffer, Paul N. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Conte, Marisa L. [4 ,6 ]
Gadabu, Oliver J. [4 ]
Kokaly, Alex N. [7 ]
Goldberg, Rebecca [8 ]
Ranusch, Allison [3 ]
Damschroder, Laura J. [3 ]
Landis-Lewis, Zach [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, NCRC Bldg 14,2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Taubman Hlth Sci Lib, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] UCLA Hlth, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
dashboard; mHealth; medical informatics; quality improvement; scoping review; health care; Cochrane library; Cochrane; stakeholder; health care sector; digital health; design; end user; development; implementation; evaluation; user need; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.2196/34894
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care organizations increasingly depend on business intelligence tools, including "dashboards," to capture, analyze, and present data on performance metrics. Ideally, dashboards allow users to quickly visualize actionable data to inform and optimize clinical and organizational performance. In reality, dashboards are typically embedded in complex health care organizations with massive data streams and end users with distinct needs. Thus, designing effective dashboards is a challenging task and theoretical underpinnings of health care dashboards are poorly characterized; even the concept of the dashboard remains ill-defined. Researchers, informaticists, clinical managers, and health care administrators will benefit from a clearer understanding of how dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated, and how the design, end user, and context influence their uptake and effectiveness. Objective: This scoping review first aims to survey the vast published literature of "dashboards" to describe where, why, and for whom they are used in health care settings, as well as how they are developed, implemented, and evaluated. Further, we will examine how dashboard design and content is informed by intended purpose and end users. Methods: In July 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed literature using a targeted strategy developed with a research librarian and retrieved 5188 results. Following deduplication, 3306 studies were screened in duplicate for title and abstract. Any abstracts mentioning a health care dashboard were retrieved in full text and are undergoing duplicate review for eligibility. Articles will be included for data extraction and analysis if they describe the development, implementation, or evaluation of a dashboard that was successfully used in routine workflow. Articles will be excluded if they were published before 2015, the full text is unavailable, they are in a non-English language, or they describe dashboards used for public health tracking, in settings where direct patient care is not provided, or in undergraduate medical education. Any discrepancies in eligibility determination will be adjudicated by a third reviewer. We chose to focus on articles published after 2015 and those that describe dashboards that were successfully used in routine practice to identify the most recent and relevant literature to support future dashboard development in the rapidly evolving field of health care informatics. Results: All articles have undergone dual review for title and abstract, with a total of 2019 articles mentioning use of a health care dashboard retrieved in full text for further review. We are currently reviewing all full-text articles in duplicate. We aim to publish findings by mid-2022. Findings will be reported following guidance from the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. Conclusions: This scoping review will provide stakeholders with an overview of existing dashboard tools, highlighting the ways in which dashboards have been developed, implemented, and evaluated in different settings and for different end user groups, and identify potential research gaps. Findings will guide efforts to design and use dashboards in the health care sector more effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National Public Health Dashboards: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Yanovitzky, Itzhak
    Stahlman, Gretchen
    Quow, Justine
    Ackerman, Matthew
    Perry, Yehuda
    Kim, Miriam
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [2] Exploring concepts of compassion in care home settings: a scoping review protocol
    Evans, Jay
    Grant, Elizabeth
    Pessi, Anne Birgitta
    Evans, Laura
    Voolma, Silja
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [3] Followership in health care clinicians: a scoping review protocol
    Alanazi, Sulaiman
    Wiechula, Richard
    Foley, David
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (12) : 3308 - 3314
  • [4] Ethical and Quality of Care-Related Challenges of Digital Health Twins in Older Care Settings: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Jabin, Md Shafiqur Rahman
    Yaroson, Emillia Vann
    Ilodibe, Adaobi
    Eldabi, Tillal
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [5] Multicultural competencies training programs for health care staff and health students in academic and professional settings: a scoping review protocol
    Teixeira-Santos, Luisa
    Camarneiro, Ana Paula
    Xavier, Beatriz
    Ventura, Filipa
    Cunha-Oliveira, Aliete
    Monteiro, Ana Paula
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (02) : 613 - 623
  • [6] Mapping Evidence of Patients' Experiences in Integrated Care Settings: A Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Youssef, Alaa T.
    Constantino, Rosa
    Chaudhary, Zarah K.
    Lee, Andrew
    Wiljer, David
    Mylopoulos, Maria
    Sockalingam, Sanjeev
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [7] Optimising expert dyad performance in acute care settings: a scoping review protocol
    Walker, Katie
    Asoodar, Maryam
    Rudolph, Jenny
    Meguerdichian, Michael
    Yusaf, Tricia
    Campbell-Taylor, Kimberly
    van Merrienboer, Jeroen
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [8] Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Cynthia Zandile Madlabana
    Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson
    Inge Petersen
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [9] Assessment of workplace integration of migrant nurses and midwives within international health care settings: a scoping review protocol
    McBrien, Barry
    O'Brien, Frances
    Shetty, Shobha Rani
    Eustace-Cook, Jessica
    Byrne, Gobnait
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (07) : 1799 - 1805
  • [10] Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Madlabana, Cynthia Zandile
    Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani Phosa
    Petersen, Inge
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)