The quality of informed consent in Croatia-a cross-sectional study and instrument development

被引:5
|
作者
Vucemilo, Luka [1 ]
Milosevic, Milan [2 ]
Dodig, Doris [3 ]
Grabusic, Bruno [4 ]
Dapic, Biljana [5 ]
Borovecki, Ana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Merkur, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Zajceva 19, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Andrija Stampar Sch Publ Hlth, Zagreb 41001, Croatia
[3] Univ Hosp Ctr Rijeka, Dept Radiol, Rijeka, Croatia
[4] Gen Hosp Zabok, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Zabok, Croatia
[5] Gen Hosp Zadar, Dept Neurol, Zadar, Croatia
关键词
Informed consent; Quality; Clinical practice; Hospital; Instrument; Croatia; Countries in transition; SHARED DECISION-MAKING; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.033
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the informed consent process implementation and quality in Croatia using a specially developed instrument. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 300 patients (response rate 73%) from six hospitals in Croatia, along with psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire. Results: Signing the informed consent form was a formality for 64% of patients, 54% of patients did not give their written consent, and in 39% of cases physicians made treatment decisions by themselves. The overall informed consent process score was 4.06 +/- 0.60 (of 5.00). Physician-patient relationship score was 4.61 +/- 0.57, Verbal information 3.99 +/- 0.98, Decision making 3.94 +/- 0.75, and Written information 3.60 +/- 1.42. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.890. Significant correlations were found in relation to Physician-patient relationship and education levels (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.18-0.99, p = 0.048), and Verbal information and duration of health problems (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.02-3.25, p = 0.041). Conclusion: The developed questionnaire is reliable and valid. The informed consent process quality in Croatia was reasonably high, although insufficient and inadequate written materials represent a weak spot that require enhancement. Practice implications: The study contributes to the development of suitable measuring instrument for assessment of the informed consent process quality in clinical practice. The questionnaire could be of use in the hospital accreditation process. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 442
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Informed Consent in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Akay, Gulsun
    Ozdede, Melih
    Karadag, Ozge
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (03): : 683 - 690
  • [2] Nurses' perception of implicit nursing care rationing in Croatia-A cross-sectional multicentre study
    Friganovic, Adriano
    Rezic, Sladana
    Kurtovic, Biljana
    Vidmanic, Sandro
    Zelenikova, Renata
    Rotim, Cecilija
    Konjevoda, Vesna
    Rezek, Biserka
    Piskor, Sanja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (08) : 2230 - 2239
  • [3] Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
    Ronald Kiguba
    Paul Kutyabami
    Stephen Kiwuwa
    Elly Katabira
    Nelson K Sewankambo
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 13
  • [4] Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy
    Valente, Emanuelle Pessa
    Mariani, Ilaria
    Covi, Benedetta
    Lazzerini, Marzia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (12)
  • [5] Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
    Kiguba, Ronald
    Kutyabami, Paul
    Kiwuwa, Stephen
    Katabira, Elly
    Sewankambo, Nelson K.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 13
  • [6] Quality of informed consent documents among US. hospitals: a cross-sectional study
    Spatz, Erica S.
    Bao, Haikun
    Herrin, Jeph
    Desai, Vrunda
    Ramanan, Sriram
    Lines, Lynette
    Dendy, Rebecca
    Bernheim, Susannah M.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Lin, Zhenqiu
    Suter, Lisa G.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (05): : e033299
  • [7] Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey
    Joffe, S
    Cook, EF
    Cleary, PD
    Clark, JW
    Weeks, JC
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 358 (9295): : 1772 - 1777
  • [8] Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials in India: A cross-sectional survey
    Gota, Vikram
    Nookala, Manjunath
    Yadav, Akanksha
    Menezes, Sonia Rebecca
    Kannan, Sadhana
    Ali, Raghib
    [J]. NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2018, 31 (06): : 334 - 338
  • [9] Informed consent practices by junior medical officers: a cross-sectional study
    Smith, Nicholas W. S.
    Overland, Joseph
    Wagstaff, Marcus
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (1-2) : 10 - 11
  • [10] Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials in India: A cross-sectional survey.
    Gota, Vikram
    Nookala, Manjunath
    Yadav, Akanksha
    Kannan, Sadhna
    Ali, Raghib
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)