Improved Patient Satisfaction following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:64
|
作者
Smith, Austin F. [1 ]
Eccles, Christian J. [1 ]
Bhimani, Samrath J. [1 ]
Denehy, Kevin M. [1 ]
Bhimani, Rohat B. [2 ]
Smith, Langan S. [3 ]
Malkani, Arthur L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Kentucky One Hlth Med Grp, Orthoped Associates, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Kentucky Hlth 1, Adult Reconstruct Program, 201 Abraham Flexner Way Suite 100, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; robotic-assisted; patient satisfaction; outcomes; OUTCOMES; GAP;
D O I
10.1055/s-0039-1700837
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Approximately 20% of the patients are dissatisfied with their total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer technology has been introduced for TKA to provide real time intraoperative information on limb alignment and exact flexion/extension gap measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient satisfaction could be improved with the use of robotic-assisted (RA) technology following primary TKA. A total of 120 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA with real time intraoperative alignment and gap balancing information were compared with a prospective cohort of 103 consecutive patients undergoing TKA with manual jig-based instruments during the same time period. There were no differences between groups with age, gender, baseline Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and function scores, follow-up, and ASA scores. TKAs were performed using same technique, implant design, anesthesia, and postoperative treatment protocols. Patient satisfaction survey using KSS and Likert scoring system were obtained at 1-year follow-up. Likert scoring system demonstrated 94% of the patients in the RA group were either very satisfied or satisfied versus 82% in the manual instruments TKA group ( p =0.005). RA-TKA group had better average scores of all five satisfaction questions although not significant. RA-TKA group had a better average overall satisfaction score of 7.1 versus 6.6 in the manual instrument group, p =0.03. KSS function scores were significantly better at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively ( p =0.02, 0.005), and KSS knee scores were significantly better at 1 year postoperatively ( p =0.046). There are multiple reasons for patient dissatisfaction following primary TKA. Using intraoperative computer technology with RA surgery for patients undergoing a primary TKA, a significant improvement in patient satisfaction was demonstrated compared with TKA using conventional manual jig-based instruments. RA surgery provides several advantages in TKA including real time information in millimeters to help obtain balanced gaps, accurate bone cuts, reduced soft tissue injury, and achieve the target alignment which may lead to improved patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 738
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computed tomography radiomics in predicting patient satisfaction after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
    Tian, Run
    Duan, Xudong
    Xing, Fangze
    Zhao, Yiwei
    Liu, ChengYan
    Li, Heng
    Kong, Ning
    Cao, Ruomu
    Guan, Huanshuai
    Li, Yiyang
    Li, Xinghua
    Zhang, Jiewen
    Wang, Kunzheng
    Yang, Pei
    Wang, Chunsheng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2024,
  • [2] Aetiology of patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty in the era of robotic-assisted technology
    Gardner, J.
    Roman, E. R.
    Bhimani, R.
    Mashni, S. J.
    Whitaker, J. E.
    Smith, L. S.
    Swiergosz, A.
    Malkani, A. L.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2024, 5 (09): : 758 - 765
  • [3] Conversion of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Lachance, Andrew D.
    Steika, Roman
    Lutton, Jeffrey
    Austin, David
    [J]. ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 23
  • [4] Is Immediate Postoperative Radiograph Necessary Following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty?
    Giordano, Joshua R.
    Bartlett, Lucas
    Huyke, Fernando
    Sadh, Puru
    Thompson, Kiara
    Ajah, Obinnah
    Danoff, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (12) : 851 - 855
  • [5] Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients
    Richardson, Mary K.
    Digiovanni, Ryan M.
    McCrae, Brian K.
    Cooperman, Wesley S.
    Ludington, John
    Heckmann, Nathanael D.
    Oakes, Daniel A.
    [J]. ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2024, 26
  • [6] Not All Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Are the Same
    Siddiqi, Ahmed
    Mont, Michael A.
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (02) : 45 - 59
  • [7] The Current Role of Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2022, 10 (12): : 989 - 991
  • [8] Clinical results and patient-reported outcomes following robotic-assisted primary total knee arthroplasty
    Joo, P. Y.
    Chen, A. F.
    Richards, J.
    Law, T. Y.
    Taylor, K.
    Marchand, K.
    Clark, G.
    Collopy, D.
    Marchand, R. C.
    Roche, M.
    Mont, M. A.
    Malkani, A. L.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2022, 3 (07): : 589 - 595
  • [9] Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study
    Christopher L. Blum
    Eric Lepkowsky
    Adil Hussein
    Edgar A. Wakelin
    Christopher Plaskos
    Jan A. Koenig
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2021, 141 : 2155 - 2164
  • [10] Patient expectations and satisfaction in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a prospective two-year outcome study
    Blum, Christopher L.
    Lepkowsky, Eric
    Hussein, Adil
    Wakelin, Edgar A.
    Plaskos, Christopher
    Koenig, Jan A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (12) : 2155 - 2164