Wind tunnel and field calibration of five aeolian sand traps

被引:141
|
作者
Goossens, D
Offer, Z
London, G
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Expt Geomorphol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Eros & Soil & Water Conservat Grp, NL-6709 PA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, Ctr Environm Phys, IL-84990 Sede Boqer, Israel
[4] Univ Salford, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Div Geog, Salford M5 4WT, Greater Manches, England
关键词
wind; saltation; calibration; sand flux; sediment sampler;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00041-6
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The efficiency of five aeolian sand samplers was tested via wind tunnel experiments and field measurements. The samplers were: the Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) sampler, the Modified Wilson and Cooke (MWAC) sampler, the Suspended Sediment Trap (SUSTRA), the Pellet catcher (POLCA), and the saltiphone. In the wind tunnel, the samplers were calibrated against an isokinetic sampler (a modified Sartorius SM 16711 sampler with adjustable flow rate), and this for three sand types (median diameter: 132, 194 and 287 mum) and live wind speeds (ranging from 6.6 to 14.4 m s(-1)). In the field, seven calibration tests of two weeks each were conducted. The absolute efficiencies of the BSNE, MWAC and POLCA are more or less comparable and vary between 70% and 120%, depending on sediment size and wind speed. For the SUSTRA, the efficiency is somewhat lower for fine sands and for wind speeds above 11 m s(-1). Finally, the saltiphone can accurately detect the periods of saltation transport, but in its current version, the instrument is not accurate when measuring the absolute saltation flux. The most recommendable sampler in the test is the MWAC, not only because of its high efficiency, but also because its efficiency is independent of wind speed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 252
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wind tunnel and field calibration of six aeolian dust samplers
    Goossens, D
    Offer, ZY
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (07) : 1043 - 1057
  • [2] Aeolian sand transport: a wind tunnel model
    Dong, ZB
    Liu, XP
    Wang, HT
    Wang, XM
    [J]. SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY, 2003, 161 (1-2) : 71 - 83
  • [3] Experimental study of aeolian sand ripples in a wind tunnel
    Cheng, Hong
    Liu, Chenchen
    Li, Jifeng
    Liu, Bo
    Zheng, Zhongquan
    Zou, Xueyong
    Kang, Liqiang
    Fang, Yi
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2018, 43 (01) : 312 - 321
  • [4] A wind tunnel investigation on the transverse motion of aeolian sand
    Wang, ZhenTing
    Zhang, QianHua
    Dong, ZhiBao
    [J]. SCIENCES IN COLD AND ARID REGIONS, 2011, 3 (01): : 13 - 16
  • [5] A wind tunnel investigation on the transverse motion of aeolian sand
    ZhenTing Wang 1*
    [J]. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 2011, 3 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [6] Modeling the Evolution of Aeolian Sand Transport in a Wind Tunnel
    Xiao, Fengjun
    Guo, Liejin
    Li, Debiao
    Wang, Yueshe
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIPHASE FLOW, HEAT MASS TRANSFER AND ENERGY CONVERSION, 2013, 1547 : 758 - 765
  • [7] Wind tunnel experimental investigation of sand velocity in aeolian sand transport
    Kang, Liqiang
    Guo, Liejin
    Gu, Zhengmeng
    Liu, Dayou
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 97 (3-4) : 438 - 450
  • [8] A first wind tunnel study on the aeolian sand transport of coral sands
    Liu, Benli
    Qu, Jianjun
    Tan, Lihai
    An, Zhishan
    Wang, Hongtao
    Wang, Tao
    Han, Qingjie
    [J]. CATENA, 2023, 222
  • [9] Fetch effect on the developmental process of aeolian sand transport in a wind tunnel
    Zongyan Chen
    Fengjun Xiao
    Zhibao Dong
    [J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2020, 12 : 436 - 446
  • [10] Fetch effect on the developmental process of aeolian sand transport in a wind tunnel
    Chen, Zongyan
    Xiao, Fengjun
    Dong, Zhibao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID LAND, 2020, 12 (03) : 436 - 446