Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using Anterior Chamber Depth from Two Devices with Barrett Universal II Formula

被引:6
|
作者
Castro, Hannah Muniz [1 ]
Tai, Audrey X. [2 ]
Sampson, Samuel J. [3 ]
Wade, Matthew [2 ]
Farid, Marjan [2 ]
Garg, Sumit [2 ]
机构
[1] UT Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Gavin Herbert Eye Inst, UC Irvine Dept Ophthalmol, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
PARTIAL COHERENCE INTERFEROMETRY; OPTICAL BIOMETRY DEVICE; IOLMASTER;
D O I
10.1155/2019/8172615
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To compare the preoperative measurements of the anterior chamber depth (ACD) by the IOLMaster and Catalys; additionally, to compare the accuracy of the IOL power calculated by the Barrett Universal II formula using the two different measurements. Setting. University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute in Irvine, California. Design. Retrospective comparative study. Methods. This study included 144 eyes of 90 patients with a mean age of 72.0 years (range 40.8 to 92.1 years) that underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using Catalys. Preoperative measurements of ACD were taken by the IOLMaster and Catalys. Manifest refraction and refractive spherical equivalent were measured 1 month postoperatively. Expected refractive results were compared with actual postoperative refractive results. Results. The correlation between the ACD values from the two devices was good (r = 0.80). The Catalys ACD measurements yielded a larger ACD compared to the IOLMaster, with a mean difference of 0.22 mm (P < 0.0001). The correlation between the postoperative and predicted RSE of the implanted IOL power was excellent (r = 0.96). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean absolute error derived from the IOLMaster, 0.37 diopter (D) +/- 0.34 (SD), and the Catalys, 0.37 +/- 0.35 D (P = 0.50). Conclusions. The Catalys biometry yielded a significantly larger ACD value than the IOLMaster. This difference in ACD value, however, did not reflect in a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation and refractive prediction error using the Barrett Universal II Formula.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness and intraocular lens calculation formula accuracy: nine formulas comparison
    Hipolito-Fernandes, Diogo
    Luis, Maria Elisa
    Serras-Pereira, Rita
    Gil, Pedro
    Maduro, Vitor
    Feijao, Joao
    Alves, Nuno
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 106 (03) : 349 - 355
  • [2] Intraocular lens power calculation in virgin eyes: Accuracy of the Barrett Universal II formula and a Ray tracing software
    Fernandez-Roses, Joaquim
    Lamarca, Jose
    Pinero, David P.
    Barraquer, Rafael, I
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (05) : 2954 - 2960
  • [3] Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula
    Yang, Soonwon
    Whang, Woong-Joo
    Joo, Choun-Ki
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [4] Evaluation of Barrett universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian Indian population
    Kuthirummal, Nikhil
    Vanathi, Murugesan
    Mukhija, Ritika
    Gupta, Noopur
    Meel, Rachna
    Saxena, Rohit
    Tandon, Radhika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (01) : 59 - +
  • [5] Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length
    Kim, Jung Wan
    Eom, Youngsub
    Yoon, Eun Gyu
    Choi, Young
    Song, Jong Suk
    Jeong, Ji Won
    Park, Seh Kwang
    Kim, Hyo Myung
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2022, 100 (03) : E701 - E709
  • [6] Comments on: Evaluation of Barrett universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian Indian population
    Shrivastava, Ankur K.
    Nayak, Swatishree
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (07) : 1507 - 1507
  • [7] Accuracy of a universal theoretical formula for power calculation in pediatric intraocular lens implantation
    Eppley, Sarah E.
    Arnold, Benjamin F.
    Tadros, Dina
    Pasricha, Neel
    Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (05): : 599 - 605
  • [8] A comparison of SRK/T formula with Hill RBF 2 and Barrett Universal II in the calculation of intraocular lens power
    Malik, Tayyaba Gul
    Moin, Muhammad
    Alam, Rabail
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 72 (07) : 1373 - 1377
  • [9] Clinical Accuracy of 6 Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Elongated Eyes, According to Anterior Chamber Depth
    Mo, Er
    Lin, Lei
    Wang, Jiangtao
    Huo, Qiuyi
    Yang, Qingwen
    Liu, Enze
    Zhang, Lu
    Yu, Yunhui
    Ye, Linying
    Pan, Anpeng
    Li, Jin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 233 : 153 - 162
  • [10] Changes in Anterior Chamber Depth after Phacoemulsification in Pseudoexfoliative Eyes and their Effect on Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation
    Gungor, Sirel Gur
    Akman, Ahmet
    Asena, Leyla
    Aksoy, Mustafa
    Sezenoz, Almila Sarigul
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 46 (06): : 255 - 258