THE MAP OF AVERAGE LAND TRANSACTION PRICES - A NEW POLISH CARTOGRAPHIC PRODUCT

被引:0
|
作者
Budzynski, Tomasz [1 ]
Karsznia, Izabela [2 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Cartog, Dept Cadastre & Land Management, PL-00661 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Geog & Reg Studies, Dept Cartog, PL-00325 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
map of transaction prices; average land transaction prices; cartographic presentation methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The map of average land transaction prices constitutes a new cartographic elaboration that is to be drawn up for the whole Poland. It has been defined in the Regulation of the Council of Ministers from October 3rd 2011 on the types of cartographic thematic and special products. According to the regulation the digital map of average land transaction prices should represent variations in average transaction prices of building and agricultural lands for the entire country in relation to the basic, three-level administrative division of the country. The paper brings closer to the idea of a map of average land transaction prices concept mentioned in the Regulation from 2011. Moreover, the authors propose the concept of the map of average transaction prices corresponding to the 1: 1000 000 detail levels for the Mazowieckie Voivodship area covering, among others, the city of Warsaw itself. In the first stage the statistical data collected for the purpose of the map elaboration have been characterized and analyzed. The result of that step was statistical indicators calculated for particular counties, which can be shown on the map having been developed. In the next stage the map concept and its design principles are introduced. With the usage of selected cartographic presentation methods the example maps were prepared. Methods and forms of cartographic presentation were chosen regarding the character of the presented phenomena, as well as a reference type of the spatial data used.
引用
收藏
页码:973 / 980
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CARTOGRAPHIC METHODS OF PRESENTATION THE AVERAGE TRANSACTION PRICES OF THE UNDEVELOPED LAND
    Ogryzek, Marek
    Ciski, Mateusz
    [J]. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING REPORTS, 2018, 28 (02) : 85 - 100
  • [2] Policy uncertainty and land transaction prices in China
    Li, Xiaoyang
    Liang, Mo
    Yang, Jidong
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL STUDIES-EPS, 2024, 12 (02): : 117 - 142
  • [3] ASSUMPTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEMATIC SERVICE OF THE AVERAGE PROPERTY TRANSACTION PRICES
    Budzynski, Tomasz
    Karsznia, Izabela
    [J]. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION (GIS ODYSSEY 2017), 2017, : 52 - 59
  • [4] ANALYSIS OF THE CHANGES IN TRANSACTION PRICES OF AGRICULTURAL LAND IN POLAND
    Heldak, Maria
    Stacherzak, Agnieszka
    Kucher, Anatoliy
    [J]. HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, VOL 7 (1), 2017, 2017, : 287 - +
  • [5] The Map and the Audience: Directions of the Cartographic Poem Development in Polish Experimental Poetry
    Bogalecki, Piotr
    [J]. TEKSTY DRUGIE, 2022, (01): : 28 - 46
  • [6] PUBLICATION OF LAND PRICE INFORMATION THROUGH THE COMPARISON OF INTERPOLATED APPRAISED PRICES AND TRANSACTION PRICES
    Inoue, R.
    Nakanishi, W.
    Sugiura, A.
    Nakano, T.
    Yoneyama, S.
    [J]. GEOSPATIAL DATA AND GEOVISUALIZATION: ENVIRONMENT, SECURITY, AND SOCIETY, 2010, 38
  • [7] Influence of Real Estate Prices Uncertainty on Land Transaction Efficiency
    Wang Xuetong
    Liu Jingxin
    Gao Xia
    Wang Xuetu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1607 - 1609
  • [8] Local land regulatory governance and land transaction prices: Micro evidence from land audits
    Feng, Chen
    Tao, Yunqing
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhu, Xingshu
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 83 : 1 - 18
  • [9] A new type of average for security prices
    Carver, HC
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1934, 5 : 73 - 80
  • [10] THE DESIGN AND PRODUCT OF NATIONAL 1:10 00000 CARTOGRAPHIC DATA OF TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
    Wang, Guizhi
    [J]. XXIII ISPRS Congress, Commission II, 2016, 41 (B2): : 245 - 249