Added value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes of breast cancer on standard MRI

被引:16
|
作者
Liu, Hong-Li [1 ]
Zong, Min [1 ]
Wei, Han [1 ]
Wang, Cong [2 ]
Lou, Jian-Juan [1 ]
Wang, Si-Qi [1 ]
Zou, Qi-Gui [1 ]
Jiang, Yan-Ni [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pathol, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
triple-negative breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; morphological features; diffusion-weighted imaging; histogram analysis; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; MAMMOGRAPHY; CHEMOTHERAPY; PREDICTION; FEATURES; BENIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S210583
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Triple-negative breast cancers generally occur in young women with remarkable potential to be aggressive. It will be of great help to detect this subtype of tumor early. To retrospectively evaluate the performance of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in distinguishing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from other subtypes of breast cancer (non-TNBC), when combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Materials and methods: From February 2014 to December 2018, 192 patients were included in this study taking preoperative standard MRI (s-MRI) and DWI. Seventy-six of them were pathologically confirmed with TNBC and rest 116 with other subtypes. First, their clinical-pathological features and morphological characteristics on MRI were assessed, including tumor size, foci quantity, tumor shape, margin, internal enhancement, and time-signal intensity curve types, in addition to the signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Second, whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis was executed. Finally, both univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to identify the most useful variables in separating TNBCs from non-TNBCs, and then their effects were evaluated following receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Result: Multivariate regression analysis indicated that circumscribed margin, rim enhancement, and ADC(90) were important predictors for TNBC. Increased area under curve (AUC) and improved specificity can be obtained when combined s-MRI and DWI (circumscribed margin+rim enhancement+ADC(90)>1.47x10(-3) mm(2)/s) is taken as the criterion, other than s-MRI (circumscribed margin+rim enhancement) alone (s-MRI+DWI vs s-MRI; AUC, 0.833 vs 0.797; specificity, 98.3% vs 89.7%; sensitivity, 68.4% vs 69.7%). Conclusion: Circumscribed margin and rim enhancement on s-MRI and ADC(90) are three important elements in detecting TNBC, while ADC histogram analysis can provide additional value in this detection.
引用
收藏
页码:8239 / 8247
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes
    Azzam, Heba
    Kamal, Rasha
    El-Assaly, Hany
    Metwally, Lamiaa I. A.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 50 (01):
  • [2] The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes
    Heba Azzam
    Rasha Kamal
    Hany El-Assaly
    Lamiaa I. A. Metwally
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50
  • [3] Rim sign and histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient values on diffusion-weighted MRI in triple-negative breast cancer: Comparison with ER-positive subtype
    Choi, Yangsean
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Youn, In Kyung
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Park, Woo-chan
    Lee, Ahwon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [4] The Relationship between Breast Cancer Subtypes, Prognostic Factors, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis
    Aktas, Elif
    Seber, Tugba Uylar
    Seber, Turgut
    Burcek, Nihan Vasfiye
    Akay, Ebru
    Arslan, Alaettin
    Eren, Saliha Karagoz
    Ozhan, Nail
    Bilgin, Ezel Yaltirik
    Savran, Burcu
    Akdur, Pinar
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [5] Mammographic and ultrasonographic features of triple-negative breast cancer: a comparison with other breast cancer subtypes
    Kim, Mi Young
    Choi, Nami
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (08) : 889 - 894
  • [6] Biological Subtypes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hubalek, Michael
    Czech, Theresa
    Mueller, Hannes
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2017, 12 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [7] MicroRNA expression in triple-negative versus other subtypes of breast cancer
    Kalniete, D.
    Nakazawa-Miklasevica, M.
    Strumfa, I.
    Abolins, A.
    Irmejs, A.
    Trofimovics, G.
    Gardovskis, J.
    Miklasevics, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S67 - S68
  • [8] Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging
    Xie, Tianwen
    Zhao, Qiufeng
    Fu, Caixia
    Bai, Qianming
    Zhou, Xiaoyan
    Li, Lihua
    Grimm, Robert
    Liu, Li
    Gu, Yajia
    Peng, Weijun
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) : 2535 - 2544
  • [9] Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging
    Tianwen Xie
    Qiufeng Zhao
    Caixia Fu
    Qianming Bai
    Xiaoyan Zhou
    Lihua Li
    Robert Grimm
    Li Liu
    Yajia Gu
    Weijun Peng
    [J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 2535 - 2544
  • [10] Directed Therapy of Subtypes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Carey, Lisa A.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 : 71 - 78