Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement and Their Differential Use by Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation in Support of War

被引:64
|
作者
Jackson, Lydia Eckstein [1 ]
Gaertner, Lowell [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Psychol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
right-wing authoritarianism; social dominance orientation; moral disengagement; war; AMERICAN STUDENTS ATTITUDES; MODEL SELECTION; PERSONALITY; VALUES; PREJUDICE; MEDIATION; IDEOLOGY; EXERCISE; BASES;
D O I
10.1002/ab.20344
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) are associated with the approval of war as a political intervention [McFarland, 2005]. We examined whether the effects of RWA and SDO on war support are mediated by moral-disengagement mechanisms [i.e., responsibility reduction, moral justification, minimizing consequences, and dehumanizing blaming victims; Bandura, 1999] and whether the ideologies use the mechanisms differently. Our data were consistent with the possibility that minimizing consequences (Study 1) and moral justification (Study 2) mediate the effects of RWA and SDO on approval of war. Both ideologies were positively associated with all moral-disengagement mechanism though more strongly so for RWA. Comparisons within ideologies suggest that RWA was most strongly associated with moral justification and SDO was most strongly associated with dehumanizing blaming victims. We discuss implications and limitations. Aggr. Behav. 36:238-250,2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 250
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Different Moral Signatures
    Milojev, Petar
    Osborne, Danny
    Greaves, Lara M.
    Bulbulia, Joseph
    Wilson, Marc S.
    Davies, Caitlin L.
    Liu, James H.
    Sibley, Chris G.
    [J]. SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2014, 27 (02) : 149 - 174
  • [2] Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Different Moral Signatures
    Petar Milojev
    Danny Osborne
    Lara M. Greaves
    Joseph Bulbulia
    Marc S. Wilson
    Caitlin L. Davies
    James H. Liu
    Chris G. Sibley
    [J]. Social Justice Research, 2014, 27 : 149 - 174
  • [3] Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice
    Whitley, BE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 77 (01) : 126 - 134
  • [4] Right-wing attitudes and moral cognition: Are Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation related to utilitarian judgment?
    Bostyn, Dries H.
    Roets, Arne
    Van Hiel, Alain
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 96 : 164 - 171
  • [5] War and prejudice: A study of social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation
    Heaven, PCL
    Organ, LA
    Supavadeeprasit, S
    Leeson, P
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (03) : 599 - 608
  • [6] The Differential Effects of Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Political Intolerance
    Crawford, Jarret T.
    Pilanski, Jane M.
    [J]. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 35 (04) : 557 - 576
  • [7] The Structure and Sources of Right-wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation
    Kandler, Christian
    Bell, Edward
    Riemann, Rainer
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2016, 30 (04) : 406 - 420
  • [8] On the correlation between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation
    Roccato, M
    Ricolfi, L
    [J]. BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 27 (03) : 187 - 200
  • [9] Effects of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism on corrupt intention: The role of moral outrage
    Tan, Xuyun
    Liu, Li
    Zheng, Wenwen
    Huang, Zhenwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [10] Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in a Canadian military sample
    Nicol, Adelheid A. M.
    Charbonneau, Danielle
    Boies, Kathleen
    [J]. MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 19 (04) : 239 - 257