Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Versus Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Assessment of Residual Tumor From Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Meta-analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Zhong, Junlin [1 ,3 ]
Su, Zhongzhen [4 ]
Zhang, Yanling [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ,3 ]
Lin, Peijie [1 ,3 ]
Tang, Xixiang [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Rongqin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Ultrasound, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Adv Med Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangdong Key Lab Liver Dis Res, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Ultrasound, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
关键词
abdominal; cancer screening; contrast-enhanced computed tomography; contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; hepatocellular carcinoma; therapeutic; transarterial chemoembolization; tumor ablation; TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; ULTRASOUND; CT; EMBOLIZATION;
D O I
10.1002/jum.14534
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis study reviewed the literature to directly evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for assessing residual tumors of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization. MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched through April 30, 2017. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated and compared to examine the diagnostic performance of CEUS versus CECT. ResultsA total of 11 studies, including 421 patients and 491 nodules were analyzed. The pooled diagnostic performances of CEUS versus CECT were as follows: (1) sensitivity (95% confidence interval), 0.97 (0.95-0.99) versus 0.72 (0.67-0.76); (2) specificity, 0.86 (0.74-0.94) versus 0.99 (0.95-1.00); (3) positive predictive value, 0.97 (0.95-0.99) versus 1.00 (0.98-1.00); (4) negative predictive value, 0.90 (0.83-0.95) versus 0.51 (0.44-0.58); (5) positive likelihood ratio, 7.79 (4.73-12.82) versus 12.50 (5.74-27.20); (6) negative likelihood ratio, 0.05 (0.03-0.09) versus 0.35 (0.26-0.48); (7) diagnostic odds ratio, 150.56 (57.03-397.49) versus 35.54 (14.89-84.83); and (8) area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.9875 versus 0.9239. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CEUS were significantly higher than those of CECT (both P<.001). The specificity and positive predictive value of CECT were significantly higher than those of CEUS (both P<.05). ConclusionsContrast-enhanced US, with better sensitivity and negative predictive value versus CECT, was an effective method for exclusion of residual tumors after transarterial chemoembolization. Contrast-enhanced CT, with higher specificity than CEUS, is a valid approach for identifying residual tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:1881 / 1890
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization: Evaluation with parametric contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
    Moschouris, Hippocrates
    Malagari, Katerina
    Marinis, Athanasios
    Kornezos, Ioannis
    Stamatiou, Konstantinos
    Nikas, Georgios
    Papadaki, Marina Georgiou
    Gkoutzios, Panagiotis
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 4 (08): : 379 - 386
  • [2] Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemoembolization: Assessment with contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasonography
    Catalano, O
    Esposito, M
    Lobianco, R
    Cusati, B
    Altei, F
    Siani, A
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (06) : 486 - 492
  • [3] Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemoembolization: Assessment with contrast-enhanced doppler ultrasonography
    Orlando Catalano
    Maria Esposito
    Roberto Lobianco
    Bianca Cusati
    Francesco Altei
    Alfredo Siani
    [J]. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 1999, 22 : 486 - 492
  • [4] Predictive factors of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Park, Kil Hyo
    Kwon, Soon Ha
    Lee, Yong Sub
    Jeong, Soung Won
    Jang, Jae Young
    Lee, Sae Hwan
    Kim, Sang Gyune
    Cha, Sang-Woo
    Kim, Young Seok
    Cho, Young Deok
    Kim, Hong Soo
    Kim, Boo Sung
    Kim, Yong Jae
    [J]. CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 21 (02) : 158 - 164
  • [5] Assessing diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in detecting small hepatocellular carcinoma A meta-analysis
    Huang, Jiasheng
    Chen, Wei
    Yao, Shanwen
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (30)
  • [6] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Residual Tumor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma following Transarterial Chemoembolization: Is It Helpful for Tumor Response
    Jiang, Tian'an
    Zhao, Qiyu
    Huang, Min
    Sun, Junhui
    Tian, Guo
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Wang, Zhili
    Tang, Jie
    An, Lichun
    Wang, Wei
    Luo, Yukun
    Li, Junlai
    Xu, Jianhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (06) : 757 - 762
  • [8] The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Xiaoyi
    Lv, Ke
    Xiao, Mengsu
    Tan, Li
    Gui, Yang
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Xueqi
    Jia, Wanying
    Li, Jinglin
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, : 3645 - 3656
  • [9] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of cystic renal cell carcinoma
    Yuan, Xinchun
    Zhou, Aiyun
    Chen, Li
    Xu, Pan
    Zhang, Cheng
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (07): : 10820 - 10826
  • [10] mRECIST criteria and contrast-enhanced US for the assessment of the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to transarterial chemoembolization
    Moschouris, Hippocrates
    Malagari, Katerina
    Papadaki, Marina G.
    Kornezos, Ioannis
    Stamatiou, Konstantinos
    Anagnostopoulos, Antonios
    Chatzimichael, Katerina
    Kelekis, Nikolaos
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 20 (02) : 136 - 142