Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial

被引:150
|
作者
Wathen, JE [1 ]
Roback, MG [1 ]
Mackenzie, T [1 ]
Bothner, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Childrens Hosp, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat,Sect Emergency Med, Denver, CO 80218 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mem.2000.111131
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: This study was conducted to investigate the frequency and severity of adverse effects, specifically emergence phenomena, experienced by patients receiving intravenous ketamine with or without midazolam for sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Methods: Patients aged 4.5 months to 16 years receiving ketamine sedation were prospectively enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study at a university-affiliated children's hospital-pediatric ED. All patients received ketamine (1 mg/kg) and glycopyrrolate (5 mug/kg) intravenously. Patients were randomly assigned to receive midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) intravenously or no midazolam. Total time of sedation, sedation efficacy, and adverse effects were recorded. Adverse effects were compared between patients receiving ketamine versus those who received ketamine and midazolam. Additional comparisons were made based on age and number of ketamine doses administered. Results: Two hundred sixty-six patients were studied; 129 received ketamine and 137 patients received ketamine and midazolam. Time of sedation and efficacy of sedation were equivalent between groups. Overall, adverse effects with ketamine sedation included respiratory events(12 [4.5%]), vomiting (50 [18.7%]), emergence phenomena in the pediatric ED (71 [26.7%]), and emergence phenomena at home (60 [22.4%]). Significant emergence phenomena in the pediatric ED (ie, nightmares, hallucinations, and severe agitation) occurred in 7.1% of the ketamine group and in 6.2% of the ketamine-midazolam group, a rate difference of 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -5.3 to 7.0). The addition of midazolam led to an increased incidence of oxygen desaturation events (ketamine 1.6% Versus ketamine-midazolam 7.3%; rate difference -5.7, 95% CI -10.6 to -0.9) but a decreased incidence of vomiting (ketamine 19.4%, ketamine-midazolam 9.6%, rate difference 9.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 18.2). The incidence of emergence phenomena and significant emergence phenomena was not affected by the addition of midazolam. However, the addition of midazolam was associated with more agitation in the pediatric ED in children 10 years or older (ketamine 5.7% versus ketamine-midazolam 35.7%; rate difference -30.0, 95% CI -10.7 to -49.3). Age breakdown further showed 6.3% (95% CI 0.9 to 11.6) more episodes of oxygen desaturation in the ketamine-midazolam group in children younger than 10 years, and 12.1% (95% CI 1.5 to 22.6) more vomiting episodes in the ketamine group in children younger than 10 years. Conclusion: Ketamine and combined ketamine and midazolam provided equally effective sedation. The addition of midazolam did not alter the incidence of emergence phenomena. Vomiting occurred more frequently in the ketamine only group, whereas oxygen desaturation occurred more frequently in the ketamine-midazolam group. These findings were more pronounced in patients younger than 10 years. Parental and physician satisfaction remained high for all patients receiving intravenous ketamine sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 588
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children: A double blind, prospective, emergency department report
    Wathen, JE
    Bothner, JP
    Roback, MG
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 121A - 121A
  • [2] Efficacy of intranasal ketamine and midazolam for pediatric sedation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Khoshrang, Hossein
    Alavi, Cyrus Emir
    Rimaz, Siamak
    Mirmansouri, Ali
    Farzi, Farnoush
    Biazar, Gelareh
    Atrkarroushan, Zahra
    Khadem, Nazanin Sabet
    [J]. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (04) : 539 - 543
  • [3] Ketamine/Propofol Versus Midazolam/Fentanyl for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Trial
    Nejati, Amir
    Moharari, Reza Shariat
    Ashraf, Haleh
    Labaf, Ali
    Golshani, Keihan
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (08) : 800 - 806
  • [4] Ketamine With and Without Midazolam for Emergency Department Sedation in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sener, Serkan
    Eken, Cenker
    Schultz, Carl H.
    Serinken, Mustafa
    Ozsarac, Murat
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [5] Efficacy of oral ketamine compared to midazolam for sedation of children undergoing laceration repair: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Rubinstein, Orit
    Barkan, Shiri
    Breitbart, Rachelle
    Berkovitch, Sofia
    Toledano, Michal
    Weiser, Giora
    Karadi, Natali
    Nassi, Anat
    Kozer, Eran
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (26)
  • [6] RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR ENDOSCOPIC SEDATION IN CHILDREN
    TOLIA, V
    FLEMING, SL
    KAUFFMAN, RE
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1990, 14 (03): : 141 - 147
  • [7] Procedural Sedation and Analgesia With Ketamine and Midazolam In Adult Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sener, S.
    Eken, C.
    Schultz, C. H.
    Serinken, M.
    Ozsarac, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 56 (03) : S20 - S20
  • [8] Comparison of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Intravenous and Intramuscular Injection of Ketamine for Children Requiring Sedation: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial Study
    Forouzan, Arash
    Moezzi, Meisam
    Aghdam, Vahid
    Delirrooyfard, Ali
    Masoumi, Kambiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS-MASHHAD, 2019, 7 (05): : 9391 - 9397
  • [9] Intravenous midazolam as a sedative for colonoscopy: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Yuno, K
    Iishi, H
    Tatsuta, M
    Hifumi, K
    Omori, M
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 10 (06) : 981 - 984
  • [10] RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR ENDOSCOPIC SEDATION IN CHILDREN
    TOLIA, V
    FLEMING, SL
    KAUFFMAN, RE
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1988, 34 (02) : 172 - 172